Investigating cognitive capacity, personality, and epistemic beliefs in relation to science achievement

被引:22
作者
Braten, Ivar [1 ]
Ferguson, Leila E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Epistemic beliefs; Justification for knowing; Working memory; Preference for rationality; Science achievement; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; KNOWLEDGE; NEED; COMPREHENSION; MOTIVATION; ARGUMENTS; DOCUMENTS; LITERACY; ACCURACY; WORKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.003
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined relationships among working memory, preference for rationality, epistemic beliefs concerning justification for knowing, and science achievement in a sample of 120 Norwegian lower-secondary school students. Results showed that working memory and preference for rationality were negatively related to beliefs in personal justification of knowledge claims in science and positively related to beliefs in justification by multiple sources and justification by scientific authority. After controlling for both working memory and preference for rationality in a hierarchical multiple regression analysis, justification beliefs still explained additional variance in science achievement, with beliefs in personal justification being a unique negative and beliefs in justification by scientific authority being a unique positive predictor. The study provides new evidence that epistemic beliefs may contribute to achievement over and above both cognitive capacity and personality factors, and theoretical as well as educational implications of these findings are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests [J].
Andreassen, Rune ;
Braten, Ivar .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2010, 33 (03) :263-283
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIENN M EUR ASS RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Handbook of individual differences in social behavior
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOG
[6]  
Baddeley A.D., 1999, Models of Working Memory, P28, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005]
[7]  
Boldrin A, 2009, INSTR SCI, V37, P107, DOI [10.1007/s11251-007-9038-1, 10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y]
[8]  
Braasch JLG, 2014, PROCESSING INACCURATE INFORMATION: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED PERSPECTIVES FROM COGNITIVE SCIENCE AND THE EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, P117
[9]   Incremental theories of intelligence predict multiple document comprehension [J].
Braasch, Jason L. G. ;
Braten, Ivar ;
Stromso, Helge I. ;
Anmarkrud, Oistein .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 31 :11-20
[10]  
Braten I., 2014, HDB INDIVIDUAL DIFFE