A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Investigating the Pain-Relieving Effect of Interferential Current on Musculoskeletal Pain

被引:14
|
作者
Hussein, Hisham M. [1 ,2 ]
Alshammari, Raghad S. [1 ]
Al-Barak, Sultana S. [1 ]
Alshammari, Norah D. [1 ]
Alajlan, Shahad N. [1 ]
Althomali, Omar W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hail, Dept Phys Therapy, Coll Appl Med Sci, Alqauid St,POB 2240, Hail, Saudi Arabia
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Dept Basic Sci, Giza, Egypt
关键词
Interferential Current; Pain; Musculoskeletal; Systematic Review; LOW-BACK-PAIN; ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION; CURRENT THERAPY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; COMBINATION THERAPY; UPPER TRAPEZIUS; MANAGEMENT; EXERCISES;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000001870
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background Interferential current is one of the most common electrotherapeutic modalities used in the treatment of painful conditions. Patients seeking medical help to reduce their musculoskeletal pain can be treated using interferential current. Objective The current review aimed to analyze the recently available information regarding the efficacy of interferential current in alleviating the pain of musculoskeletal origin. Methods This study used Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOas as data sources. The initial selection of the studies, thorough assessment of the full articles, and extraction of the necessary study characteristics were carried out by two independent reviewers. Another two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each included trial against 39 criteria. These criteria were integrated from several popular scales. Pain intensity-measured using the visual analog scale, numeric pain rating scale, or McGill Pain Questionnaire-was the outcome of interest. Results This review included 35 trials of variable methodological quality from which 19 trials were selected for the meta-analysis. In general, interferential current alone versus placebo demonstrated a significant pain-relieving effect. On the other hand, interferential current showed no significant difference when added to standard treatment compared with placebo plus standard treatment or standard treatment alone. Similarly, interferential current showed no significant difference when compared with other single interventions (laser, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, cryotherapy). Conclusions Interferential current alone is better than placebo at discharge. However, the low number of studies raises suspicions about this conclusion. Interferential current alone or added to other interventions is not more effective than comparative treatments in relieving musculoskeletal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 633
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of Interferential Current Therapy in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fuentes, Jorge P.
    Olivo, Susan Armijo
    Magee, David J.
    Gross, Douglas P.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2010, 90 (09): : 1219 - 1238
  • [2] Effects of Exercise Therapy on Endogenous Pain-relieving Peptides in Musculoskeletal Pain A Systematic Review
    Fuentes C, Jorge P.
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Magee, David J.
    Gross, Douglas P.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 27 (04) : 365 - 374
  • [3] Effectiveness of interferential current in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Rampazo, Erika P.
    Luz Jr, Mauricio A.
    Correa, Juliana B.
    de Oliveira, Naiane T. B.
    dos Santos, Irlei
    Liebano, Richard E.
    Costa, Leonardo O. P.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 27 (05)
  • [4] Tibetan herbal pain-relieving plaster for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Mingxiao
    Li, Susan Q.
    Smith, Colleen M.
    Zhang, Yi Lily
    Bao, Ting
    Mao, Jun J.
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2021, 140
  • [5] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current demonstrate similar effects in relieving acute and chronic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    de Almeida, Camila Cadena
    Maldaner da Silva, Vinicius Z.
    Cipriano Junior, Gerson
    Liebano, Richard Eloin
    Quagliotti Durigan, Joao Luiz
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 22 (05) : 347 - 354
  • [6] Effect of exergames on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Collado-Mateo, D.
    Merellano-Navarro, E.
    Olivares, P. R.
    Garcia-Rubio, J.
    Gusi, N.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2018, 28 (03) : 760 - 771
  • [7] Effectiveness of Pain Neurophysiology Education on Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bulow, Kasper
    Lindberg, Kasper
    Vaegter, Henrik Bjarke
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04) : 891 - 904
  • [8] Opioids for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Jones, Caitlin M. P.
    Langford, Aili
    Maher, Chris G.
    Abdel Shaheed, Christina
    Day, Richard
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    DRUGS, 2024, 84 (03) : 305 - 317
  • [9] Investigating the Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Pain Among Iranian Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hatef, Masoud
    Abdi, Alireza
    Tarjoman, Asma
    Borji, Milad
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS REVIEW, 2019, 7 (04) : 191 - 198
  • [10] Ultrasound therapy for pain reduction in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guan, Haiying
    Wu, Yilun
    Wang, Xiangyang
    Liu, Bo
    Yan, Ting
    Abedi-Firouzjah, Razzagh
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN CHRONIC DISEASE, 2024, 15