Exploring Faculty and Student Frameworks for Engineering Knowledge Using an Online Card Sorting Platform

被引:8
作者
Chen, Diana A. [1 ]
Hoople, Gordon D. [2 ]
Ledwith, Nico [3 ]
Burlingame, Eric [3 ]
Bush, Seth D. [4 ]
Scott, Gregory E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ San Diego, Integrated Engn, 5998 Alcala Pk, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[2] Univ San Diego, Integrated Engn, Shiley Marcos Sch Engn, 5998 Alcala Pk, San Diego, CA 92110 USA
[3] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA USA
[4] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Chem & Biochem, 1 Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY | 2020年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Faculty attitudes; interdisciplinary; assessment tools; student perception; philosophy of engineering education; MIDDLE; MIND;
D O I
10.3991/ijep.v10i1.11336
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this study we investigate how faculty and students think about engineering using a technique new to engineering education: card sorting. In card sorting participants sort stimuli (cards) into groups, in the process revealing how they categorize information. Here we examine how both engineering faculty (n=23) and first-year undergraduate students (n=62) categorize engineering scenarios. We found engineering faculty sort based on cross-disciplinary engineering activities rather than engineering disciplines. This is a surprising result as our educational frameworks are based around disciplines, and yet they are not the primary way in which faculty think. First-year students, on the other hand, showed little consensus on how to sort the scenarios. As a part of this paper we unveil an online card sorting platform Collection and Analysis of Research Data for Sorting (CARDS). CARDS allows researchers to create card sorting tasks, distribute them to participants for remote data collection, and analyze quantitative results.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 81
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [11] How Middle Schoolers Draw Engineers and Scientists
    Fralick, Bethany
    Kearn, Jennifer
    Thompson, Stephen
    Lyons, Jed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 18 (01) : 60 - 73
  • [12] Fryrear A., 2015, What's a good survey response rate?
  • [13] A Comparison of How Undergraduates, Graduate Students, and Professors Organize Organic Chemistry Reactions
    Galloway, Kelli R.
    Leung, Min Wah
    Flynn, Alison B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 95 (03) : 355 - 365
  • [14] Ganesh T., 2009, 2009 ANN C EXP, DOI 10.2190/WR.14.4.h
  • [15] Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education
    Godfrey, Elizabeth
    Parker, Lesley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2010, 99 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [16] Jarlstrom M., 2017, MATS JARLSTROM I AM
  • [17] Concept Mapping and Mind Mapping to Lift the Thinking Skills of Chemical Engineering Students
    Joao, I. M.
    Silva, J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2014, 4 (05): : 42 - 48
  • [18] Knight M., 2004, P 2004 AM SOC ENG ED, P11
  • [19] Thinking Like a Chemist: Development of a Chemistry Card-Sorting Task To Probe Conceptual Expertise
    Krieter, Felicia E.
    Julius, Ryan W.
    Tanner, Kimberly D.
    Bush, Seth D.
    Scott, Gregory E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 93 (05) : 811 - 820
  • [20] Layton E. T., 1971, REVOLT ENG SOC RESPO, V5, P25