Mixed Methods in Health Psychology Theoretical and Practical Considerations of the Third Paradigm

被引:43
作者
Dures, E.
Rumsey, N. [1 ]
Morris, M.
Gleeson, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Ctr Appearance Res, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
关键词
epidermolysis bullosa; health psychology; mixed methods; paradigm; pragmatism; QUESTIONS; FORM;
D O I
10.1177/1359105310377537
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article has two purposes: to examine why mixed methods is a legitimate approach particularly well suited to health psychology; and to describe the challenges inherent in conducting mixed methods research. First, arguments justifying the status of mixed methods as a third paradigm alongside solely quantitative and qualitative frameworks are discussed. Second, a qualitatively driven model of mixed methods is illustrated using examples from a research programme exploring the psychosocial impact of a rare, genetic skin disorder. The flexibility of a mixed methods approach enables the researcher to be responsive to a range of issues, but it is important the approach is used thoughtfully and appropriately.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 341
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CHRONIC ILL IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], QUALITATIVE EVALUATI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio Causal and control beliefs, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00393-000
  • [4] [Anonymous], THESIS U W ENGLAND B
  • [5] [Anonymous], REAL WORLD RES
  • [6] [Anonymous], QUALITATIVE IN PRESS
  • [7] [Anonymous], SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE
  • [8] Barbour R S, 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P39
  • [9] Brannen J., 2004, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC, P312
  • [10] Braun V., 2011, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA