Framing and repetition effects on risky choices: A behavioural approach

被引:3
作者
Herranz-Zarzoso, Noemi [1 ,2 ]
Sabater-Grande, Gerardo [1 ,2 ]
Jaramillo-Gutierrez, Ainhoa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaume 1, LEE, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
[2] Univ Jaume 1, Econ Dept, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
关键词
Risk aversion; Framing effects; Risk task repetition; Choice list procedure; PREFERENCES; AVERSION; MISCONCEPTIONS; UTILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2019.101504
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Framing effects play an important role in individual decision-making under risk. This investigation revisits framing effects caused by two versions of the choice list procedure, lottery vs. lottery (LL) and lottery vs. certainty (LC). In the first, subjects face pairwise choices between lotteries within a choice list. In the second, subjects face pairwise choices between a safe amount and a lottery. In order to measure the sensitivity of subjects' choices to the structure of the tasks, we implement an incentive-compatible experiment using repetition in order to have a robust measure of the subjects' propensity to make a choice. Particularly, it is tested whether variations in the number of options offered in a choice list with and without variations in the range of options affect subjects' choices. Our results suggest that changes in framework disturb subjects' risk preferences only in the LC version when the range of options presented has been varied.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006)
    Andersen, Steffen
    Harrison, Glenn W.
    Lau, Morten Igel
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) : 99 - 100
  • [2] RISK AVERSION RELATES TO COGNITIVE ABILITY: PREFERENCES OR NOISE?
    Andersson, Ola
    Holm, Hakan J.
    Tyran, Jean-Robert
    Wengstrom, Erik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2016, 14 (05) : 1129 - 1154
  • [3] Decisions, error and heterogeneity
    Ballinger, TP
    Wilcox, NT
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 107 (443) : 1090 - 1105
  • [4] Bartling B, 2015, J ECON SCI ASSOC-JES, V1, P72, DOI 10.1007/s40881-015-0008-0
  • [5] The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
    Beattie, J
    Loomes, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1997, 14 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [6] Beauchamp J. P., 2012, MALLEABLE ARE UNPUB
  • [7] MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD
    BECKER, GM
    DEGROOT, MH
    MARSCHAK, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03): : 226 - 232
  • [8] Range effects and lottery pricing
    Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
    Koehler, Wolfgang R.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (03) : 332 - 349
  • [9] Measuring risk aversion with lists: a new bias
    Bosch-Domenech, Antoni
    Silvestre, Joaquim
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2013, 75 (04) : 465 - 496
  • [10] Separated decisions
    Brown, Alexander L.
    Healy, Paul J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 101 : 20 - 34