What patients and care partners want in a wearable dialysis device: a mixed-methods study

被引:5
作者
Jonsdottir, Auour Anna [1 ]
Kessler, Larry G. [2 ]
Rim, Seung-Yeon [1 ]
Kim, Ji-Eun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Box 352650, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Physical fatigue; mental fatigue; fatigue; HOME DIALYSIS; TELEHEALTH;
D O I
10.1080/24725579.2021.1958273
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Few studies have explored the similarities and differences between patients' and care partners' perspectives in terms of their ideal dialysis procedure and desired outcomes. As part of a project to improve the quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease, we elicited unbiased feedback from both patients and care partners regarding the design of a wearable dialysis device tailored to meet users' clinical needs. We interviewed 24 hemodialysis patients and 12 hemodialysis care partners using a mixed-methods approach of open-ended and rank-order questions. Inductive content analysis showed that both patients and care partners preferred a wearable dialysis device that a patient could carry on their upper body, particularly on their back or shoulder, or wear as a vest. Analysis of responses to the rank-order questions showed a significant preference for a vest design. Operational simplicity and compactness were the attributes most frequently mentioned in response to the open-ended questions, while the accuracy of the device was ranked as significantly more important than ease of attachment, comfort, simplicity, size, or invisibility in response to the rank-order questions. The findings from this study will help to ensure that new wearable dialysis devices are designed in accordance with patients' and care partners' preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Impellicceiri S., 2018, Designing medical devices for healing interactions: A dialysis case study, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6723263.v1, DOI 10.1184/R1/6723263.V1]
[12]   Human factors considerations in designing a personalized mobile dialysis device: An interview study [J].
Kim, Ji-Eun ;
Kessler, Larry ;
McCauley, Zach ;
Niiyama, Itsumi ;
Boyle, Linda Ng .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 85
[13]   Telehealth in the Delivery of Home Dialysis Care: Catching up With Technology [J].
Krishna, Vinay N. ;
Managadi, Kamesha ;
Smith, Michael ;
Wallace, Eric .
ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2017, 24 (01) :12-16
[14]  
Lee J. D., 2017, Designing for People: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering
[15]   Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review [J].
Liyanage, Thaminda ;
Ninomiya, Toshiharu ;
Jha, Vivekanand ;
Neal, Bruce ;
Patrice, Halle Marie ;
Okpechi, Ikechi ;
Zhao, Ming-hui ;
Lv, Jicheng ;
Garg, Amit X. ;
Knight, John ;
Rodgers, Anthony ;
Gallagher, Martin ;
Kotwal, Sradha ;
Cass, Alan ;
Perkovic, Vlado .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9981) :1975-1982
[16]   MEETING OUR PATIENTS HALFWAY: TOWARD AN ETHIC OF CARE IN PSYCHOANALYSIS [J].
Maddux, Hilary .
PSYCHOANALYSIS SELF AND CONTEXT, 2018, 13 (03) :205-219
[17]   Dialysis Modality Preference of Patients With CKD and Family Caregivers: A Discrete-Choice Study [J].
Morton, Rachael L. ;
Snelling, Paul ;
Webster, Angela C. ;
Rose, John ;
Masterson, Rosemary ;
Johnson, David W. ;
Howard, Kirsten .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2012, 60 (01) :102-111
[18]  
Motti V.G., 2014, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, V58, P205, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581381, DOI 10.1177/1541931214581381, 10.1177/1541931214581381]
[19]  
Muhr T., 1997, ATLAS. ti
[20]  
Nicdao MA, 2016, REN SOC AUSTRALAS J, V12, P41