Asymmetric Maxillary Protraction for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate Patients Using Finite Element Analysis

被引:15
作者
Chen, Zhengxi [1 ]
Pan, Xiaogang [1 ]
Zhao, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Zhenqi [1 ]
Shen, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Stomatol, Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Orthodont,Sch Stomatol, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Unilateral cleft lip and palate; asymmetric maxillary protraction; finite element analysis; ALVEOLAR BONE-GRAFT; CRANIOFACIAL SKELETON; EXPANSION; ANCHORAGE; SUTURES; INDIVIDUALS; FACEMASK; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000001337
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients frequently present with an asymmetry in the nasomaxillary complex and a maxillary hypoplasia. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanic effects of asymmetric maxillary protraction in UCLP patients using finite element method. Methods: A finite element model of a UCLP patient's skull was generated using data from spiral computed tomographic scans. On the basis of this finite element model, three groups of orthopedic forces were loaded. All forces were applied in a direction that was 30 degrees downward and forward to the occlusal plane on the region of the alveolar of the maxillary canine. The value of orthopedic force was 5 N in cleft side and 5 N in noncleft side (group A), 6 N in cleft side and 5 N in noncleft side (group B), and 7 N in cleft side and 5 N in noncleft side (group C), respectively. Results: All 3 groups were effective in promoting maxilla forward. In group B, the displacement difference between the cleft side and the noncleft side was the smallest. The largest value difference between the cleft side and the noncleft side was found in group C. Conclusions: Maxillary protraction with a loading of 6 N in the cleft side and 5 N in the noncleft side produced the most favorable outcome. It can be suggested that it might be advantageous to perform asymmetric maxillary protraction on UCLP patients.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 392
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients [J].
Ahn, Hyo-Won ;
Kim, Keun-Woo ;
Yang, Il-Hyung ;
Choi, Jin-Young ;
Baek, Seung-Hak .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (05) :935-941
[2]  
Borzabadi-Farahani A, 2012, CLEFT PALATE CRANIOF
[3]   Biomechanical Effects on Maxillary Protraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton With Cleft Lip and Palate After Alveolar Bone Graft [J].
Chen, Zhengxi ;
Pan, Xiaogang ;
Shao, Qinghua ;
Chen, Zhenqi .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) :446-453
[4]  
Collins J. A., 1993, Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design: Analysis, Prediction, Prevention
[5]  
COUPE T B, 1960, Probl Sovrem Neirokhirurgii, V26, P600, DOI 10.1097/00006534-196012000-00005
[6]   Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction [J].
De Clerck, Hugo ;
Tung Nguyen ;
de Paula, Leonardo Koerich ;
Cevidanes, Lucia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (01) :25-31
[7]  
Dogan Servet, 2012, Ann Maxillofac Surg, V2, P116, DOI 10.4103/2231-0746.101332
[8]   Development of an efficient, non-viral transfection method for studying gene function and bone growth in human primary cranial suture mesenchymal cells reveals that the cells respond to BMP2 and BMP3 [J].
Dwivedi, Prem P. ;
Anderson, Peter J. ;
Powell, Barry C. .
BMC BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 12
[9]   Skeletal response to maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: A finite element study [J].
Gautam, Pawan ;
Valiathan, Ashima ;
Adhikari, Raviraj .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (06) :723-728