Surgical sequence in anterior column realignment with posterior osteotomy is important for degree of adult spinal deformity correction: advantages and indications for posterior to anterior sequence

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Sung-Min [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Chan [1 ]
Kim, Ki-Tack [1 ]
Ha, Kee-Yong [1 ]
Luo, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiongjie [1 ,2 ]
Park, JunBum [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 892 Dongnam Ro, Seoul 05278, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Adult spinal deformity; Posterior osteotomy; Anterior column realignment; Surgical sequence; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMIES; INTERBODY FUSION; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; CAGE SUBSIDENCE; COMPLICATIONS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PARAMETERS; BALANCE; DEGENERATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-022-05915-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background We hypothesized that posterior osteotomy prior to ACR (Anterior column realignment) through P-A-P surgical sequence would permit a greater correction for deformity corrective surgery than the traditional A-P sequence without posterior osteotomy. This study aimed to determine the impact of the P-A-P sequence on the restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) compared to the A-P sequence in deformity corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and to identify the characteristics of patients who require this sequence. Methods Between 2017 and 2019, 260 ASD patients who had undergone combined corrective surgery were reviewed retrospectively. This study included 178 patients who underwent posterior osteotomy before the ACR (P-A group) and 82 patients who underwent the A-P sequence (A-P group). Sagittal spinopelvic parameters were determined from pre- and postoperative whole-spine radiographs and compared between the groups. To find better indications for the P-A-P sequence, we conducted additional analysis on postoperative outcomes of patients in the A-P group. Results The P-A group showed a significantly higher change in LL (53.7 degrees vs. 44.3 degrees, p < 0.001), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA: 197.4 mm vs. 146.1 mm, p = 0.021), segmental lordosis (SL) L2/3 (16.2 degrees vs. 14.4 degrees, p = 0.043), SL L3/4 (16.2 degrees vs. 13.8 degrees, p = 0.004), and SL L4/5 (15.1 degrees vs. 11.3 degrees, p = 0.001) compared to the A-P group. At the final follow-up, pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL mismatch (PI - LL mismatch) was significantly higher in the A-P group (13.4 degrees vs. 2.9 degrees, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age >= 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.151; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.414-3.272; p < 0.001), severe osteoporosis (OR = 2.824; 95% CI, 1.481-5.381; p = 0.002), rigid lumbar curve with dynamic changes in LL < 10 degrees (OR = 5.150; 95% CI, 2.296-11.548; p < 0.001), and severe facet joint osteoarthritis (OR = 4.513; 95% CI, 1.958-10.402; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PI - LL mismatch >= 10 degrees after A-P surgery. Conclusion P-A-P sequence for deformity corrective surgery in ASD offers greater LL correction than the A-P sequence. Indications for the procedure include patients aged >= 75 years, severe osteoporosis, rigid lumbar curve with dynamic change in LL < 10 degrees, or more than four facet joints of Pathria grade 3 in the lumbar region.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incidence and Risk Factors of Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Rupture After Posterior Corrective Surgery Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Maruo, Keishi
    Arizumi, Fumihiro
    Kusuyama, Kazuki
    Kishima, Kazuya
    Tachibana, Toshiya
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (01): : E26 - E31
  • [42] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Primary and Revision Surgery Using a Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach n Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity and Sagittal Imbalance
    Kim, Whoan Jeang
    Shin, Hyun Min
    Song, Dae Geon
    Lee, Jae Won
    Park, Kun Young
    Chang, Shann Haw
    Bae, Jin Hyun
    Choy, Won Sik
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (02) : 196 - 206
  • [43] Surgical Outcomes of Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparative Clinical Study
    Iwamae, Masayoshi
    Matsumura, Akira
    Namikawa, Takashi
    Kato, Minori
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Sawada, Yuta
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (04) : 421 - 429
  • [44] Prevalence and Modes of Posterior Hardware Failure With a Staged Protocol for Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A 13-Year Experience
    Anand, Neel
    Chung, Andrew
    Kong, Christopher
    Alayan, Alisa
    Khandehroo, Babak
    Kahwaty, Sheila
    Gendelberg, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (03) : 481 - 489
  • [45] Elucidation of the Mechanism of Occasional Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Rupture with Posterior Correction Procedure for Adult Spinal Deformity Using LLIF-Finite Element Analysis of the Impact of the Lordotic Angle of Intervertebral LLIF Cage
    Takeda, Hiroki
    Abe, Yuichiro
    Imai, Takaya
    Rashid, Mohd Zaim Mohd
    Ikeda, Daiki
    Kawabata, Soya
    Nagai, Sota
    Hachiya, Kurenai
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Kaneko, Shinjiro
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (09):
  • [46] Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior/Posterior Staged Versus Same-Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Passias, Peter G.
    Ahmad, Waleed
    Tretiakov, Peter S.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Line, Breton
    Daniels, Alan
    Mir, Jamshaid M.
    Gupta, Munish
    Mundis, Gregory
    Eastlack, Robert
    Nunley, Pierce
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Hostin, Richard
    Hart, Robert
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Schwab, Frank
    Ames, Christopher
    Smith, Justin S.
    Bess, Shay
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (13) : 893 - 901
  • [47] Response to Letter to the Editor on "Critical Analysis of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Following Anterior/Posterior Staged Versus Same Day Surgery in Patients Undergoing Identical Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity"
    Onafowokan, Oluwatobi O.
    Monas, Arie
    Yung, Anthony
    Fisher, Max R.
    Das, Ankita
    Cottrill, Ethan J.
    Prado, Isabel P.
    Wu, Caroline M.
    Passias, Peter G.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (24) : E426 - E427
  • [48] Anterior Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 in Hybrid Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Radiographic Results, Mechanical Complications, and Clinical Outcomes
    Park, Se-Jun
    Kang, Dong-Ho
    Park, Jin-Sung
    Kang, Minwook
    Lee, Chong-Suh
    Jung, Kyunghun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)
  • [49] Does the anterior column realignment technique influences the stresses on posterior instrumentation in sagittal imbalance correction? A biomechanical, finite-element analysis of L5-S1 ALIF and L3-4 lateral ACR
    Panico, Matteo
    Bertoli, Marco
    Villa, Tomaso Maria Tobia
    Galbusera, Fabio
    Messori, Matteo
    La Maida, Giovanni Andrea
    Misaggi, Bernardo
    Gallazzi, Enrico
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [50] Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Anterior-Posterior Combined Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Kotani, Yoshihisa
    Ikeura, Atsushi
    Tanaka, Takahiro
    Saito, Takanori
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (01):