Diagnostic accuracy of epithelial membrane antigen for malignant effusions: a meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Lin, Wentao [1 ]
Liu, Xiaoxue [1 ]
Cen, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Burn & Plast Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Diagnosis; EMA; Malignant effusion; Meta-analysis; DNA FLOW-CYTOMETRY; ADENOCARCINOMA CELLS; PLEURAL EFFUSION; SEROUS EFFUSIONS; MESOTHELIOMA; MARKERS; HETEROGENEITY; BENIGN; PANEL;
D O I
10.5301/jbm.5000181
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: Body cavity fluid examination sometimes presents a diagnostic challenge in cytology practice. This meta-analysis was undertaken to comprehensively assess the diagnostic potential of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) in malignant effusions. Materials and methods: All relevant original articles about EMA in the diagnosis of malignant effusions published up to July 1, 2014 were retrieved. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were pooled to evaluate the diagnostic value of EMA for malignant effusions using the Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 12.0 statistical software. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis and the summary estimates for EMA in the diagnosis of malignant effusions were as follows: sensitivity 0.9 (95% CI 0.83-0.87), specificity 0.87 (95% CI 0.96-0.99), positive likelihood ratio 5.8 (95% CI 15.59-36.37), negative likelihood ratio 0.15 (95% CI 0.07-0.20) and diagnostic odds ratio 52.63 (95% CI 20.91-132.49). The SROC curve indicated that the maximum joint sensitivity and specificity (Q-value) was 0.88; the area under the curve was 0.94. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis indicated that EMA may be a useful diagnostic tool with good sensitivity and specificity for differentiating malignant effusions from benign effusions.
引用
收藏
页码:E11 / E16
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression
    Baker, W. L.
    White, C. Michael
    Cappelleri, J. C.
    Kluger, J.
    Coleman, C. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (10) : 1426 - 1434
  • [2] Bisht B, 2014, MALAY J PATHOL, V36, P83
  • [3] Malignant effusions: From diagnosis to biology
    Davidson, B
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 31 (04) : 246 - 254
  • [4] The diagnostic and molecular characteristics of malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma
    Davidson, B.
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [5] Statistics notes - Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7458): : 168 - 169
  • [6] DION AS, 1990, BIOCHEM INT, V22, P295
  • [7] Ensani F, 2011, POL J PATHOL, V62, P95
  • [8] Improved identification of malignant cells in serous effusions using a small, robust panel of antibodies on paraffin-embedded cell suspensions
    Grefte, Johanna M. M.
    de Wilde, Peter C.
    de Pol, Maria R. J. Salet-van
    Tomassen, Marc
    Geloof, Wilhelmina L. Raaymakers-van
    Bulten, Johan
    [J]. ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2008, 52 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [9] IMMUNOFLUORESCENT STAINING OF METASTATIC CARCINOMA-CELLS IN SEROUS FLUID WITH CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIBODY, EPITHELIAL MEMBRANE ANTIBODY, AUA-1 AND BER-EP4
    ILLINGWORTH, AL
    YOUNG, JA
    JOHNSON, GD
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 5 (05) : 270 - 281
  • [10] Doing meta-analysis in research: A systematic approach
    Jain, Vivek
    Sharma, Rinku
    Singh, Saudan
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2012, 78 (03) : 242 - 250