Metoprolol Versus Amiodarone in the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Trial

被引:28
|
作者
Halonen, Jari [1 ]
Loponen, Pertti [2 ]
Jarvinen, Otso [3 ]
Karjalainen, Jari [1 ]
Parviainen, Ilkka [1 ]
Halonen, Pirjo [4 ]
Magga, Jarkko [1 ]
Turpeinen, Anu [1 ]
Hippelainen, Mikko [1 ]
Hartikainen, Juha [1 ]
Hakala, Tapio [5 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Kuopio 70211, Finland
[2] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Vaasa 65100, Finland
[3] Tampere Heart Ctr, Tampere 33521, Finland
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[5] N Karelia Cent Hosp, Joensuu 80210, Finland
关键词
ARTERY-BYPASS-SURGERY; OPEN-HEART-SURGERY; INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE; ORAL AMIODARONE; GRAFT-SURGERY; PROPHYLAXIS; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTORS; INTERVENTIONS; ARRHYTHMIAS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-153-11-201012070-00003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Current guidelines recommend beta-blockers as the first-line preventive treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery. Despite this, 19% of physicians report using amiodarone as first-line prophylaxis of postoperative AF. Data directly comparing the efficacy of these agents in preventing postoperative AF are lacking. Objective: To determine whether intravenous metoprolol and amiodarone are equally effective in preventing postoperative AF after cardiac surgery. Design: Randomized, prospective, equivalence, open-label, multicenter study. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00784316) Setting: 3 cardiac care referral centers in Finland. Patients: 316 consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable and free of mechanical ventilation and AF within 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 48-hour infusion of metoprolol, 1 to 3 mg/h, according to heart rate, or amiodarone, 15 mg/kg of body weight daily, with a maximum daily dose of 1000 mg, starting 15 to 21 hours after cardiac surgery. Measurements: The primary end point was the occurrence of the first AF episode or completion of the 48-hour infusion. Results: Atrial fibrillation occurred in 38 of 159 (23.9%) patients in the metoprolol group and 39 of 157 (24.8%) patients in the amiodarone group (P = 0.85). However, the difference (-0.9 percentage point [90% CI, -8.9 to 7.0 percentage points]) does not meet the prespecified equivalence margin of 5 percentage points. The adjusted hazard ratio of the metoprolol group compared with the amiodarone group was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.76). Limitations: Caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocation, and the trial evaluated only stable patients who were not at particularly elevated risk for AF. The withdrawal of preoperative beta-blocker therapy may have increased the risk for AF in the amiodarone group. Conclusion: The occurrence of AF was similar in the metoprolol and amiodarone groups. However, because of the wide range of the CIs, the authors cannot conclude that the 2 treatments were equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 709
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Continuous vs episodic prophylactic treatment with amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation - A randomized trial
    Ahmed, Sheba
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
    Links, Thera P.
    Wiesfeld, Ans C. P.
    Hillege, Hans L.
    Bosker, Hans A.
    Lok, Dirk J. A.
    Van Veldhuisen, Dirk J.
    Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (15): : 1784 - 1792
  • [42] Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery: The Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Pilot Trial
    Staben, Rae
    Vnencak-Jones, Cindy L.
    Shi, Yaping
    Shotwell, Matthew S.
    Absi, Tarek
    Shah, Ashish S.
    Wanderer, Jonathan P.
    Beller, Marc
    Kertai, Miklos D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (10) : 1974 - 1982
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness of amiodarone to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    Reddy, P
    Gao, X
    Burrell, A
    Boci, K
    Bouin, O
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 263 - 263
  • [44] The effects of amiodarone and early cardioversion on postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    Atar, I.
    Karacaglar, E.
    Ozbicer, S.
    Ozcobanoglu, S.
    Yazici, A.
    Gultekin, B.
    Sezgin, A.
    Muderrisoglu, H.
    Aslamaci, S.
    Ozin, B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 : 113 - 113
  • [45] PHYSIOLOGIC BIATRIAL PACING VERSUS INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE FOR PREVENTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY
    Akbarzadeh, F.
    Golmohammadi, A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 : S107 - S107
  • [46] Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the SPPAF study
    Auer, J
    Weber, T
    Berent, R
    Puschmann, R
    Harti, F
    Ng, CK
    Strasser, U
    Eber, B
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 602 - 602
  • [47] Mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
    Echahidi, Najmeddine
    Pibarot, Philippe
    O'Hara, Gilles
    Mathieu, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 51 (08) : 793 - 801
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of intravenous propafenone versus intravenous amiodarone in the conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter after cardiac surgery
    Larbuisson, R
    Venneman, I
    Stiels, B
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1996, 10 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [50] AMIODARONE VERSUS QUINIDINE REVERSION OF ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION POST-CARDIAC SURGERY
    MCALISTER, HF
    LUKE, RA
    SMITH, WM
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 16 (04): : 588 - 588