Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of the very high temperature gas-cooled reactor-based nuclear hydrogen production system using copper-chlorine cycle

被引:30
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Liu, Chunyu [1 ]
Luo, Run [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ]
Li, Dantong [3 ]
Macian-Juan, Rafael [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich TUM, Chair Nucl Technol, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Univ South China, Sch Resource & Environm & Safety Engn, Hengyang 421001, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
关键词
Nuclear hydrogen production; Very high temperature gas-cooled; reactor; Copper-chlorine cycle; Combined cycle; Thermo-economic analysis; Particle swarm optimization; IODINE-SULFUR PROCESS; THERMOCHEMICAL CYCLE; TURBINE CYCLE; POWER-PLANT; COGENERATION; ELECTRICITY; VHTR; PURIFICATION; DESIGN; PHASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.060
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
An improved very high temperature gas-cooled reactor (VHTR) and copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle-based nuclear hydrogen production system is proposed and investigated in this paper, in order to reveal the unknown thermo-economic characteristics of the system under variable operating conditions. Energy, exergy and economic analysis method and particle swarm optimization algorithm are used to model and optimize the system, respectively. Parametric analysis of the effects of several key operating parameters on the system performance is conducted, and energy loss, exergy loss, and investment cost distributions of the system are discussed under three typical production modes. Results show that increasing the reactor subsystem pressure ratio can enhance the system's thermo economic performance, and the total efficiencies and cost of producing compressed hydrogen from nuclear energy are respectively lower and higher than that of generating electricity. When the system operates at the maximum hydrogen production rate of 403.1 mol/s, the system's net electrical power output, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, and specific energy cost are found to be 38.77 MW, 39.3%, 41.26%, and 0.0731 $/kW center dot h, respectively. And when the system's hydrogen production load equals to 0, these values are respectively calculated to be 177.25 MW, 50.64%, 53.29%, and 0.0268 $/kW center dot h. In addition, more than 90% of the system's total energy losses are caused by condenser and Cu-Cl cycle, and about 50-60% of the system's total exergy destructions occur in VHTR. About 60% and 30% of the system's specific energy cost are respectively caused by the equipment investment and the system operation & maintenance, and the investment costs of VHTR and Cu-Cl plant are the system's main capital investment sources. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31563 / 31585
页数:23
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Analysis and assessment of the integrated generation IV gas-cooled fast nuclear reactor and copper-chlorine cycle for hydrogen and electricity production
    Al-Zareer, Maan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 205
  • [2] Assessment and analysis of hydrogen and electricity production from a Generation IV lead-cooled nuclear reactor integrated with a copper-chlorine thermochemical cycle
    Al-Zareer, Maan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (01) : 91 - 103
  • [3] Performance analysis of a supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactor integrated with a combined cycle, a Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle and a hydrogen compression system
    Al-Zareer, Maan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 : 646 - 658
  • [4] Development and assessment of a novel integrated nuclear plant for electricity and hydrogen production
    Al-Zareer, Maan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 134 : 221 - 234
  • [5] Purification of Sulfuric and Hydriodic Acids Phases in the Iodine-sulfur Process
    Bai Ying
    Zhang Ping
    Guo Hanfei
    Chen Songzhe
    Wang Laijun
    Xu Jingming
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 17 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [6] Evaluation of an iron-chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production
    Canavesio, Cristian
    Nassini, Horacio E.
    Bohe, Ana E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (28) : 8620 - 8632
  • [7] Dincer I, 2012, SUSTAINABLE ENERGY S
  • [8] Eberhart R., 2002, MHS95 6 INT S MICROM, DOI DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215
  • [9] Updates on promising thermochemical cycles for clean hydrogen production using nuclear energy
    El-Emam, Rami S.
    Ozcan, Hasan
    Zamfirescu, Calin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 262 (262)
  • [10] Performance assessment of a combined system to link a supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactor and a thermochemical water splitting cycle for hydrogen production
    Granovskii, Mikhail
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Rosen, Marc A.
    Pioro, Igor
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 49 (07) : 1873 - 1881