The role of participatory scenarios in ecological restoration: a systematic map protocol

被引:2
作者
Moore, Eleanor [1 ]
Howson, Pete [2 ]
Grainger, Matthew [3 ]
Teh, Yit Arn [1 ]
Pfeifer, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Social Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Postbox 5685, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidence synthesis; Alternative futures; Place-based research; Socioecological systems; Trade-offs; Co-production; Stakeholder engagement; INDICATORS; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s13750-022-00276-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: The scale of land degradation worldwide has led the UN to declare the Decade of Ecosystem Restoration and movements such as the Bonn Challenge (https://www.bonnchallenge.org/), have placed ecological restoration on the global policy agenda. Achieving such ambitious policy targets and restoration goals will necessitate complex trade-offs against limited time, competing knowledge, costs, resources, and varying societal preferences among different stakeholders. Participatory scenarios are a tool to navigate uncertainties surrounding future trajectories and simultaneously incorporate different stakeholder perspectives. They can provide a path to identify collaborative solutions best suited for the local cultures and societies they are tied to. However, there is no systematic understanding of how participatory scenarios are being used in ecological restoration planning to navigate trade-offs in restoration outcomes. We will fill this research gap by mapping the existing evidence from participatory restoration scenarios to answer the primary research question 'How are outcomes explored in participatory ecological restoration scenarios?' This will be done through five sub-questions focussing on characteristics of the evidence base, types of study design, how outcomes and trade-offs in those are explored, and an examination of the role of participants in the scenario process and outcome determination. Methods: This protocol outlines the methods for a systematic map to identify studies that have used participatory scenarios in restoration planning. A comprehensive and reproducible search strategy will be undertaken across bibliographic databases, web-based engines, and targeted searches in organisational online libraries. Searches will be done online in English, but results in all languages will be screened. Search results will go through a two-step screening process of against pre-determined criteria of inclusion and exclusion, for title and abstract and then full-text. Data will be extracted from eligible studies using a standardised data extraction spreadsheet where details on study characteristics, design and outcomes will be recorded. A searchable database of studies and mapping outcomes will be available upon completion of the work. The aim is to inform how scenarios can be better used as a decision-making tool to increase stakeholder participation and account for trade-offs in restoration outcomes across social, ecological, and economic dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Gaps and limitations in the use of restoration scenarios: a review
    Acosta, Andre L.
    d'Albertas, Francisco
    Leite, Melina de Souza
    Saraiva, Antonio M.
    Walter Metzger, Jean P.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1108 - 1119
  • [2] Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework
    Agarwal, B
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) : 1623 - 1648
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, SCOPUS
  • [4] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [5] A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nation's Decade on Ecosystem Restoration
    Aronson, James
    Goodwin, Neva
    Orlando, Laura
    Eisenberg, Cristina
    Cross, Adam T.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (04) : 730 - 736
  • [6] Bringing multiple values to the table: assessing future land-use and climate change in North Kona, Hawai'i
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Mandle, Lisa
    Trauernicht, Clay
    Pascua, Pua'ala
    McMillen, Heather L.
    Burnett, Kimberly
    Wada, Christopher A.
    Kurashima, Natalie
    Quazi, Shimona A.
    Giambelluca, Thomas
    Chock, Pia
    Ticktin, Tamara
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (01):
  • [7] Brown K., 2004, Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, DOI [10.7312/mcsh12764-013, DOI 10.7312/MCSH12764-013]
  • [8] C.A.B. International, 1990, CAB ABSTRACTS COMM A
  • [9] THE ORIGINS AND PRACTICE OF PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL
    CHAMBERS, R
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 22 (07) : 953 - 969
  • [10] Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
    Cooke, Alison
    Smith, Debbie
    Booth, Andrew
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2012, 22 (10) : 1435 - 1443