Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation

被引:7
作者
Noufal, Manthala Padannayil [1 ]
Sharma, Shamurailatpam Dayananda [1 ]
Patro, Katikeshwar [1 ]
Arjunan, Manikandan [1 ]
Krishnan, Ganapathy [1 ]
Tyagarajan, Rajesh [1 ]
Rana, Suresh [3 ]
Chillukuri, Srinivas [2 ]
Jalali, Rakesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai 400053, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Oklahoma Proton Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Oklahoma City, OK 73142 USA
关键词
CSI; Spot position error; Robust optimization; Spot spacing; IMPT; Proton therapy; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00625-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We investigated the influence of random spot positioning errors (SPEs) on dosimetric outcomes of robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (RB-IMPT) plans in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Six patients with CSI treated using the RB-IMPT technique were selected. An in-house MATLAB code was used to simulate a random SPE of 1 mm in positive, negative, and both directions for 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total spot positions in the nominal plan. The percentage dose variation (Delta D-%) in the six nominal and 54 error-introduced plans was evaluated using standard dose-volume indices, line dose difference, and 3D gamma analysis method. The introduction of a random SPE of 1 mm resulted in a reduction in D-99%, D-98%, and D-95% of both CTVs and PTVs by < 2% compared with the corresponding nominal plans. However, this leads to an increase in D-1% of the lens by up to 16.9%. The line dose in the junction region showed Delta D-% < 2% for the brain and upper spine and < 4% for the upper and lower spine. The 3D gamma values for 3% at 3 mm and 2% at 2 mm were above 99% and 95%, respectively, in all 54 error-introduced plans. The worst decrease in gamma values was observed for 1% at 1 mm, with values ranging from 64 to 78% for all types of SPE. The RB-IMPT plan for CSI investigated in this study is robust enough for target coverage, even if there are random SPEs of 1 mm. However, this leads to an increase in the dose to the critical organ located close to the target.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Patient-specific bolus for range shifter air gap reduction in intensity-modulated proton therapy of head-and-neck cancer studied with Monte Carlo based plan optimization [J].
Michiels, Steven ;
Barragan, Ana Maria ;
Souris, Kevin ;
Poels, Kenneth ;
Crijns, Wouter ;
Lee, John A. ;
Sterpin, Edmond ;
Nuyts, Sandra ;
Haustermans, Karin ;
Depuydt, Tom .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 128 (01) :161-166
[42]   Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification [J].
van de Water, Steven ;
Belosi, Maria F. ;
Albertini, Francesca ;
Winterhalter, Carla ;
Weber, Damien C. ;
Lomax, Antony J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (09)
[43]   Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer [J].
Liang, Xiaoying ;
Vega, Raymond B. ;
Li, Zuofeng ;
Zheng, Dandan ;
Mendenhall, Nancy ;
Bradley, Julie A. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
[44]   Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques [J].
Liu, Wei ;
Li, Yupeng ;
Li, Xiaoqiang ;
Cao, Wenhua ;
Zhang, Xiaodong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) :3089-3101
[45]   Efficiency of analytical and sampling-based uncertainty propagation in intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Wahl, N. ;
Hennig, P. ;
Wieser, H. P. ;
Bangert, M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (14) :5790-5807
[46]   Analytical incorporation of fractionation effects in probabilistic treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Wahl, Niklas ;
Hennig, Philipp ;
Wieser, Hans-Peter ;
Bangert, Mark .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) :1317-1328
[47]   Cardiac-Sparing and Breast-Sparing Whole Lung Irradiation Using Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy [J].
Wong, Ru Xin ;
Faught, Jacqueline ;
Gargone, Melissa ;
Myers, William ;
Krasin, Matthew ;
Faught, Austin ;
Acharya, Sahaja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 7 (04) :65-73
[48]   Post-Irradiation Sinus Mucosa Disease in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy [J].
Wu, Pei-Wen ;
Huang, Chien-Chia ;
Lee, Yun-Shien ;
Chou, Yung-Chih ;
Fan, Kang-Hsing ;
Lin, Chien-Yu ;
Huang, Bing-Shen ;
Yang, Shih-Wei ;
Huang, Chi-Che ;
Chang, Po-Hung ;
Lee, Ta-Jen ;
Chang, Joseph Tung-Chieh .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (01)
[49]   Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer based on radiobiological modelling [J].
Nguyen, My-Lien ;
Afrin, Kazi T. ;
Newbury, Patrick ;
Henson, Christina ;
Ahmad, Salahuddin .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
[50]   Dosimetric impact of positional uncertainties and a robust optimization approach for rectal intensity-modulated brachytherapy [J].
Moren, Bjoern ;
Thibodeau-Antonacci, Alana ;
Kalinowski, Jonathan ;
Enger, Shirin A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 52 (06) :3528-3540