Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation

被引:7
作者
Noufal, Manthala Padannayil [1 ]
Sharma, Shamurailatpam Dayananda [1 ]
Patro, Katikeshwar [1 ]
Arjunan, Manikandan [1 ]
Krishnan, Ganapathy [1 ]
Tyagarajan, Rajesh [1 ]
Rana, Suresh [3 ]
Chillukuri, Srinivas [2 ]
Jalali, Rakesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai 400053, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Oklahoma Proton Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Oklahoma City, OK 73142 USA
关键词
CSI; Spot position error; Robust optimization; Spot spacing; IMPT; Proton therapy; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00625-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We investigated the influence of random spot positioning errors (SPEs) on dosimetric outcomes of robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (RB-IMPT) plans in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Six patients with CSI treated using the RB-IMPT technique were selected. An in-house MATLAB code was used to simulate a random SPE of 1 mm in positive, negative, and both directions for 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total spot positions in the nominal plan. The percentage dose variation (Delta D-%) in the six nominal and 54 error-introduced plans was evaluated using standard dose-volume indices, line dose difference, and 3D gamma analysis method. The introduction of a random SPE of 1 mm resulted in a reduction in D-99%, D-98%, and D-95% of both CTVs and PTVs by < 2% compared with the corresponding nominal plans. However, this leads to an increase in D-1% of the lens by up to 16.9%. The line dose in the junction region showed Delta D-% < 2% for the brain and upper spine and < 4% for the upper and lower spine. The 3D gamma values for 3% at 3 mm and 2% at 2 mm were above 99% and 95%, respectively, in all 54 error-introduced plans. The worst decrease in gamma values was observed for 1% at 1 mm, with values ranging from 64 to 78% for all types of SPE. The RB-IMPT plan for CSI investigated in this study is robust enough for target coverage, even if there are random SPEs of 1 mm. However, this leads to an increase in the dose to the critical organ located close to the target.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy [J].
Li, Yupeng ;
Niemela, Perttu ;
Liao, Li ;
Jiang, Shengpeng ;
Li, Heng ;
Poenisch, Falk ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Siljamaki, Sami ;
Vanderstraeten, Reynald ;
Sahoo, Narayan ;
Gillin, Michael ;
Zhang, Xiaodong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) :4840-4847
[32]   LOCAL SETUP REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE SPINAL COLUMN WHEN USING INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION WITH PATIENT IN SUPINE POSITION [J].
Stoiber, Eva Maria ;
Giske, Kristina ;
Schubert, Kai ;
Sterzing, Florian ;
Habl, Gregor ;
Uhl, Matthias ;
Herfarth, Klaus ;
Bendl, Rolf ;
Debus, Juergen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05) :1552-1559
[33]   Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison [J].
Nguyen, My-Lien ;
Cantrell, J. Nathan ;
Ahmad, Salahuddin ;
Henson, Christina .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) :259-263
[34]   Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Bai, Xuemin ;
Lim, Gino ;
Grosshans, David ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Cao, Wenhua .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (02)
[35]   Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients [J].
Giantsoudi, Drosoula ;
Seco, Joao ;
Eaton, Bree R. ;
Simeone, F. Joseph ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Yock, Torunn I. ;
Tarbell, Nancy J. ;
DeLaney, Thomas F. ;
Adams, Judith ;
Paganetti, Harald ;
MacDonald, Shannon M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (01) :37-46
[36]   An online adaptive plan library approach for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Oud, Michelle ;
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Gizynska, Marta ;
Kroesen, Michiel ;
Hutschemaekers, Stefan ;
Habraken, Steven ;
Petit, Steven ;
Perko, Zoltan ;
Heijmen, Ben ;
Hoogeman, Mischa .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 176 :68-75
[37]   Comparison of photon volumetric modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, and intensity-modulated carbon ion therapy for delivery of hypo-fractionated thoracic radiotherapy [J].
Chi, Alexander ;
Lin, Lien-Chun ;
Wen, Sijin ;
Yan, Haijuan ;
Hsi, Wen-Chien .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12
[38]   Comparison of photon volumetric modulated arc therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, and intensity-modulated carbon ion therapy for delivery of hypo-fractionated thoracic radiotherapy [J].
Alexander Chi ;
Lien-Chun Lin ;
Sijin Wen ;
Haijuan Yan ;
Wen-Chien Hsi .
Radiation Oncology, 12
[39]   A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites [J].
Kase, Yuki ;
Yamashita, Haruo ;
Fuji, Hiroshi ;
Yamamoto, Yuichi ;
Pu, Yuehu ;
Tsukishima, Chihiro ;
Murayama, Shigeyuki .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) :272-280
[40]   The impact of dose algorithms on tumor control probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer [J].
Liang, Xiaoying ;
Bradley, Julie A. ;
Zheng, Dandan ;
Rutenberg, Michael ;
Vega, Raymond Mailhot ;
Mendenhall, Nancy ;
Li, Zuofeng .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 61 :52-57