Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation

被引:7
作者
Noufal, Manthala Padannayil [1 ]
Sharma, Shamurailatpam Dayananda [1 ]
Patro, Katikeshwar [1 ]
Arjunan, Manikandan [1 ]
Krishnan, Ganapathy [1 ]
Tyagarajan, Rajesh [1 ]
Rana, Suresh [3 ]
Chillukuri, Srinivas [2 ]
Jalali, Rakesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai 400053, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Oklahoma Proton Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Oklahoma City, OK 73142 USA
关键词
CSI; Spot position error; Robust optimization; Spot spacing; IMPT; Proton therapy; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00625-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We investigated the influence of random spot positioning errors (SPEs) on dosimetric outcomes of robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (RB-IMPT) plans in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Six patients with CSI treated using the RB-IMPT technique were selected. An in-house MATLAB code was used to simulate a random SPE of 1 mm in positive, negative, and both directions for 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total spot positions in the nominal plan. The percentage dose variation (Delta D-%) in the six nominal and 54 error-introduced plans was evaluated using standard dose-volume indices, line dose difference, and 3D gamma analysis method. The introduction of a random SPE of 1 mm resulted in a reduction in D-99%, D-98%, and D-95% of both CTVs and PTVs by < 2% compared with the corresponding nominal plans. However, this leads to an increase in D-1% of the lens by up to 16.9%. The line dose in the junction region showed Delta D-% < 2% for the brain and upper spine and < 4% for the upper and lower spine. The 3D gamma values for 3% at 3 mm and 2% at 2 mm were above 99% and 95%, respectively, in all 54 error-introduced plans. The worst decrease in gamma values was observed for 1% at 1 mm, with values ranging from 64 to 78% for all types of SPE. The RB-IMPT plan for CSI investigated in this study is robust enough for target coverage, even if there are random SPEs of 1 mm. However, this leads to an increase in the dose to the critical organ located close to the target.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Evaluation of replanning in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Factors influencing plan robustness [J].
Deiter, Noelle ;
Chu, Felicia ;
Lenards, Nishele ;
Hunzeker, Ashley ;
Lang, Karen ;
Mundy, Daniel .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (04) :384-392
[22]   Intensity-modulated proton therapy and osteoradionecrosis in oropharyngeal cancer [J].
Zhang, Wencheng ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Yang, Pei ;
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Gunn, Brandon ;
Fuller, C. David ;
Chambers, Mark ;
Hutcheson, Katherine A. ;
Ye, Rong ;
Lai, Stephen Y. ;
Radwan, Mohamed Abdallah Sherif ;
Zhu, X. Ron ;
Frank, Steven J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 (03) :401-405
[23]   Comparison of proton arc therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma [J].
Henjum, Helge ;
Feten, Karoline M. ;
Ytre-Hauge, Kristian S. ;
Boer, Camilla G. ;
Stokkevag, Camilla H. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 :S4695-S4698
[24]   Use of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) for Reducing the Dose to Cochlea in Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) of Pediatric Patients [J].
Dormer, J. ;
Kassaee, A. ;
Lin, H. ;
Ding, X. ;
Lustig, R. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) :302-302
[25]   Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer [J].
Smith, Grace L. ;
Fu, Shuangshuang ;
Ning, Matthew S. ;
Nguyen, Diem-Khanh ;
Busse, Paul M. ;
Foote, Robert L. ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Gunn, Gary B. ;
Fuller, Clifton D. ;
Morrison, William H. ;
Chronowski, Gregory M. ;
Shah, Shalin J. ;
Mayo, Lauren L. ;
Phan, Jack ;
Reddy, Jay P. ;
Snider, James W. ;
Patel, Samir H. ;
Katz, Sanford R. ;
Lin, Alexander ;
Mohammed, Nasiruddin ;
Dagan, Roi ;
Lee, Nancy Y. ;
Rosenthal, David, I ;
Frank, Steven J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2021, 8 (01) :319-327
[26]   A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Sayed, Hisham Kamal ;
Herman, M. G. ;
Beltran, C. J. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) :2049-2060
[27]   Dosimetric Comparison and Selection Criteria of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Adaptive Re-Plan in T3-4 Nasopharynx Cancer Patients [J].
Ko, Mincheol ;
Yang, Kyungmi ;
Ahn, Yong Chan ;
Ju, Sang Gyu ;
Oh, Dongryul ;
Kim, Yeong-bi ;
Kwon, Dong Yeol ;
Park, Seyjoon ;
Lee, Kisung .
CANCERS, 2024, 16 (19)
[28]   Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal proton therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of metastatic brain cancer [J].
Sullivan, Matthew ;
Jin, Hosang ;
Ahmad, Salahuddin .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (02) :73-76
[29]   Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Kamal-Sayed, Hisham ;
Ma, J. ;
Tseung, H. ;
Abdel-Rehim, A. ;
Herman, M. G. ;
Beltran, C. J. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) :5643-5652
[30]   Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Gu, Wenbo ;
Neph, Ryan ;
Ruan, Dan ;
Zou, Wei ;
Dong, Lei ;
Sheng, Ke .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) :3356-3370