Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation

被引:7
|
作者
Noufal, Manthala Padannayil [1 ]
Sharma, Shamurailatpam Dayananda [1 ]
Patro, Katikeshwar [1 ]
Arjunan, Manikandan [1 ]
Krishnan, Ganapathy [1 ]
Tyagarajan, Rajesh [1 ]
Rana, Suresh [3 ]
Chillukuri, Srinivas [2 ]
Jalali, Rakesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai 400053, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Apollo Proton Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 100 Feet Rd Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Oklahoma Proton Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Oklahoma City, OK 73142 USA
关键词
CSI; Spot position error; Robust optimization; Spot spacing; IMPT; Proton therapy; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00625-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We investigated the influence of random spot positioning errors (SPEs) on dosimetric outcomes of robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (RB-IMPT) plans in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Six patients with CSI treated using the RB-IMPT technique were selected. An in-house MATLAB code was used to simulate a random SPE of 1 mm in positive, negative, and both directions for 25%, 50%, and 75% of the total spot positions in the nominal plan. The percentage dose variation (Delta D-%) in the six nominal and 54 error-introduced plans was evaluated using standard dose-volume indices, line dose difference, and 3D gamma analysis method. The introduction of a random SPE of 1 mm resulted in a reduction in D-99%, D-98%, and D-95% of both CTVs and PTVs by < 2% compared with the corresponding nominal plans. However, this leads to an increase in D-1% of the lens by up to 16.9%. The line dose in the junction region showed Delta D-% < 2% for the brain and upper spine and < 4% for the upper and lower spine. The 3D gamma values for 3% at 3 mm and 2% at 2 mm were above 99% and 95%, respectively, in all 54 error-introduced plans. The worst decrease in gamma values was observed for 1% at 1 mm, with values ranging from 64 to 78% for all types of SPE. The RB-IMPT plan for CSI investigated in this study is robust enough for target coverage, even if there are random SPEs of 1 mm. However, this leads to an increase in the dose to the critical organ located close to the target.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of spot positional errors in robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plan of craniospinal irradiation
    Manthala Padannayil Noufal
    Shamurailatpam Dayananda Sharma
    Katikeshwar Patro
    Manikandan Arjunan
    Ganapathy Krishnan
    Rajesh Tyagarajan
    Suresh Rana
    Srinivas Chillukuri
    Rakesh Jalali
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2021, 14 : 271 - 278
  • [2] Robustly optimized hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation
    Noufal, Manthala Padannayil
    Sharma, Shamurailatpam Dayananda
    Krishnan, Ganapathy
    Sawant, Mayur
    Gaikwad, Utpal
    Jalali, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1597 - 1603
  • [3] A Pilot Study on the Comparison between Planning Target Volume-based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plans and Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plans
    Perumal, Bojarajan
    Sundaresan, Harikrishna Etti
    Vaitheeswaran, Ranganathan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (03) : 179 - 184
  • [4] Knowledge-Based Planning for Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Xu, Yihang
    Cyriac, Jonathan
    De Ornelas, Mariluz
    Bossart, Elizabeth
    Padgett, Kyle
    Butkus, Michael
    Diwanji, Tejan
    Samuels, Stuart
    Samuels, Michael A.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [5] Comparison of passive-scattered and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy of craniospinal irradiation with proton beams for pediatric and young adult patients with brain tumors
    Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu
    Hikaru Kubota
    Yusuke Demizu
    Takeshi Suzuki
    Daiichiro Hasegawa
    Yoshiyuki Kosaka
    Atsufumi Kawamura
    Toshinori Soejima
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2024, 42 : 182 - 189
  • [6] Comparison of passive-scattered and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy of craniospinal irradiation with proton beams for pediatric and young adult patients with brain tumors
    Fukumitsu, Nobuyoshi
    Kubota, Hikaru
    Demizu, Yusuke
    Suzuki, Takeshi
    Hasegawa, Daiichiro
    Kosaka, Yoshiyuki
    Kawamura, Atsufumi
    Soejima, Toshinori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 42 (02) : 182 - 189
  • [7] Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Rocha, Humberto
    Mohan, Radhe
    Lim, Gino
    Goudarzi, Hadis M.
    Ferreira, Brigida C.
    Dias, Joana M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (13)
  • [8] Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the postoperative irradiation of thymoma
    Franceschini, Davide
    Cozzi, Luca
    Loi, Mauro
    Franzese, Ciro
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2267 - 2276
  • [9] Evaluation of robustly optimised intensity modulated proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Scandurra, Daniel
    Meijer, Tineke W. H.
    Free, Jeffrey
    van den Hoek, Johanna G. M.
    Kelder, Lotta
    Oldehinkel, Edwin
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Both, Stefan
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 168 : 221 - 228
  • [10] Impact of errors in spot size and spot position in robustly optimized pencil beam scanning proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (07): : 147 - 154