Bone health after RRBSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a population-based study

被引:4
作者
do Valle, Helena Abreu [1 ]
Kaur, Paramdeep [1 ]
Kwon, Janice S. [1 ]
Cheifetz, Rona [2 ,3 ]
Dawson, Lesa [1 ,4 ]
Hanley, Gillian E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Div Gynaecol Oncol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Surg, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] BC Canc Agcy, Hereditary Canc Program, High Risk Clin, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Div Gynaecol Oncol, St John, NL, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome; Osteoporotic Fractures; Osteoporosis; Epidemiology; REDUCING SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY; BREAST-CANCER; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; EARLY MENOPAUSE; FOLLOW-UP; RISK; WOMEN; OSTEOPOROSIS; FRACTURES;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e51
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Examine the risks of fractures and osteoporosis after risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) among women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Methods: In this retrospective population-based study in British Columbia, Canada, between 1996 to 2017, we compared risks of osteoporosis and fractures among women with BRCA1/2 mutations who underwent RRBSO before the age of 50 (n=329) with two age-matched groups without known mutations: 1) women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy (BO) (n=3,290); 2) women with intact ovaries who had hysterectomy or salpingectomy (n=3,290). Secondary outcomes were: having dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, and bisphosphonates use. Results: The mean age at RRBSO was 42.4 years (range, 26-49) and the median follow-up for women with BRCA1/2 mutations was 6.9 years (range, 1.1-19.9). There was no increased hazard of fractures for women with BRCA1/2 mutations (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.56-1.14 compared to women who had BO; aHR=1.02; 95% CI=0.65-1.61 compared to women with intact ovaries). Among women who had DEXA-scan, those with BRCA1/2 mutations had higher risk of osteoporosis (aHR=1.60; 95% CI=1.00-2.54 compared to women who had BO; aHR=2.49; 95% CI=1.44-4.28 compared to women with intact ovaries). Women with BRCA1/2 mutations were more likely to get DEXA-scan than either control groups, but only 46% of them were screened. Of the women with BRCA1/2 mutations diagnosed with osteoporosis, 36% received bisphosphonates. Conclusion: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations had higher risk of osteoporosis after RRBSO, but were not at increased risk of fractures during our follow-up. Low rates of DEXA-scan and bisphosphonates use indicate we can improve prevention of bone loss.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Obstet Gynecol, V130, pe110, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002296
[2]   Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer [J].
Atchley, Deann P. ;
Albarracin, Constance T. ;
Lopez, Adriana ;
Valero, Vicente ;
Amos, Christopher I. ;
Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria ;
Hortobagyi, Gabriel N. ;
Arun, Banu K. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (26) :4282-4288
[3]  
BC Ministry of Health, 2017, POP DAT BC POPDATA D
[4]  
BC Ministry of Health, 2017, POPULATION DATA BC M
[5]  
Ben-Aharon Irit, 2018, Oncotarget, V9, P15931, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.24638
[6]   Senescence aging, and malignant transformation mediated by p53 in mice lacking the Brcal full-length isoform [J].
Cao, L ;
Li, WM ;
Kim, S ;
Brodie, SG ;
Deng, CX .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 17 (02) :201-213
[7]   Surveillance of survivors: Follow-up after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers [J].
Chapman, Jocelyn S. ;
Powell, C. Bethan ;
McLennan, Jane ;
Crawford, Beth ;
Mak, Julie ;
Stewart, Nicola ;
Chen, Lee-may .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (02) :339-343
[8]   Non-cancer endpoints in BRCA1/2 carriers after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy [J].
Cohen, J. V. ;
Chiel, L. ;
Boghossian, L. ;
Jones, M. ;
Stopfer, J. E. ;
Powers, J. ;
Rebbeck, T. R. ;
Nathanson, K. L. ;
Domchek, S. M. .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2012, 11 (01) :69-75
[9]   Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021 [J].
Daly, Mary B. ;
Pal, Tuya ;
Berry, Michael P. ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Dickson, Patricia ;
Domchek, Susan M. ;
Elkhanany, Ahmed ;
Friedman, Susan ;
Goggins, Michael ;
Hutton, Mollie L. ;
Karlan, Beth Y. ;
Khan, Seema ;
Klein, Catherine ;
Kohlmann, Wendy ;
Kurian, Allison W. ;
Laronga, Christine ;
Litton, Jennifer K. ;
Mak, Julie S. ;
Menendez, Carolyn S. ;
Merajver, Sofia D. ;
Norquist, Barbara S. ;
Offit, Kenneth ;
Pederson, Holly J. ;
Reiser, Gwen ;
Senter-Jamieson, Leigha ;
Shannon, Kristen Mahoney ;
Shatsky, Rebecca ;
Visvanathan, Kala ;
Weitzel, Jeffrey N. ;
Wick, Myra J. ;
Wisinski, Kari B. ;
Yurgelun, Matthew B. ;
Darlow, Susan D. ;
Dwyer, Mary A. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2021, 19 (01) :77-102
[10]   Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy [J].
Diana, Anna ;
Carlino, Francesca ;
Giunta, Emilio Francesco ;
Franzese, Elisena ;
Guerrera, Luigi Pio ;
Di Lauro, Vincenzo ;
Ciardiello, Fortunato ;
Daniele, Bruno ;
Orditura, Michele .
CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (05)