Breast Cancer Prognostic Biomarker Using Attractor Metagenes and the FGD3-SUSD3 Metagene

被引:17
作者
Yang, Tai-Hsien Ou [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Wei-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Tian [3 ]
Maurer, Matthew A. [4 ]
Anastassiou, Dimitris [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Syst Biol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Elect Engn, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Stat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
EXPRESSION-BASED PREDICTORS; SIGNATURE; SURVIVAL; CONCORDANCE; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0399
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The winning model of the Sage Bionetworks/ DREAM Breast Cancer Prognosis Challenge made use of several molecular features, called attractor metagenes, as well as another metagene defined by the average expression level of the two genes FGD3 and SUSD3. This is a follow-up study toward developing a breast cancer prognostic test derived from and improving upon that model. Methods: We designed a feature selector facility calculating the prognostic scores of combinations of features, including those that we had used earlier, as well as those used in existing breast cancer biomarker assays, identifying the optimal selection of features for the test. Results: The resulting test, called BCAM( Breast Cancer Attractor Metagenes), is universally applicable to all clinical subtypes and stages of breast cancer and does not make any use of breast cancer molecular subtype or hormonal status information, none of which provided additional prognostic value. BCAM is composed of several molecular features: the breast cancer-specific FGD3-SUSD3 metagene, four attractor metagenes present in multiple cancer types ( CIN, MES, LYM, and END), three additional individual genes (CD68, DNAJB9, and CXCL12), tumor size, and the number of positive lymph nodes. Conclusions: Our analysis leads to the unexpected and remarkable suggestion that ER, PR, and HER2 status, or molecular subtype classification, do not provide additional prognostic value when the values of the FGD3-SUSD3 and attractor metagenes are taken into consideration. Impact: Our results suggest that BCAM's prognostic predictions show potential to outperform those resulting from existing breast cancer biomarker assays. (C)2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:2850 / 2856
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aspirin Treatment Effect and Association with PIK3CA Mutation in Breast Cancer: A Biomarker Analysis
    Zhou, Yunyun
    Simmons, Josh
    Jordan, Christina D.
    Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam
    Maihle, Nita
    Tang, Shou-Ching
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2019, 19 (05) : 354 - +
  • [32] Left laterality is an independent prognostic factor for metastasis in N3 stage breast cancer
    Karatas, Fatih
    Sahin, Suleyman
    Erdem, Gokmen U.
    Ates, Ozturk
    Babacan, Taner
    Akin, Serkan
    Sever, Ali R.
    Ozisik, Yavuz
    Altundag, Kadri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2016, 21 (04): : 851 - 858
  • [33] SerpinB3, a new prognostic tool in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Collie-Duguid, Elaina S. R.
    Sweeney, Kathleen
    Stewart, Keith N.
    Miller, Iain D.
    Smyth, Elizabeth
    Heys, Steven D.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 132 (03) : 807 - 818
  • [34] Prognostic Factors in Operated Stage IIIC, Pathological N3a Breast Cancer Patients
    Turker, Ibrahim
    Arslan, Ulku Y.
    Yazici, Ozan
    Uyeturk, Ummugul
    Oksuzoglu, Berna
    Budakoglu, Burcin
    Ozdemir, Nuriye
    Sonmez, Ozlem U.
    Helvaci, Kaan
    Esbah, Onur
    Bal, Oznur
    Ekinci, Ahmet S.
    Zengin, Nurullah
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2014, 9 (06) : 421 - 427
  • [35] Prognostic significance of FOXP3+tumour-infiltrating Tregs in Egyptian breast cancer patients
    Abdelkader, Mohamed Mkayed
    Saied, Eman Mohammed
    ElShourbagy, Safinaz Hamdy ElShourbagy
    El-Anwer, Noha Mohamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 73 (04) : S146 - S150
  • [36] Over-expression of SRD5A3 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer
    Zhang, Yong-ping
    Na, Wen-ting
    Dai, Xiao-qiang
    Li, Ruo-fei
    Wang, Jian-xiong
    Gao, Ting
    Zhang, Wei-bo
    Xiang, Cheng
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [37] Exploring a novel four-gene system as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for triple-negative breast cancer, using clinical variables
    Ali, Faisal
    Iqbal, Azhar
    Azhar, Iqra
    Qayyum, Adiba
    Hassan, Syed Ali
    Al Hasan, Md. Sakib
    Jawi, Motasim
    Hassan, Hesham M.
    Al-Emam, Ahmed
    Sajid, Muhammad
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 113
  • [38] Prognostic Impact of Elevation of Cancer Antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in Patients With Early Breast Cancer With Normal Serum CA15-3 Level
    Ryu, Jai Min
    Kang, Danbee
    Cho, Juhee
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    Kim, Seok Won
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Lee, Se Kyung
    Kim, Yeon Jin
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Park, Yeon Hee
    Kim, Ji-Yeon
    Lee, Hyunjong
    Kang, Mira
    Yu, Jong Han
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2023, 26 (02) : 126 - 135
  • [39] TLR3 serves as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and is closely correlated with immune microenvironment in three types of cancer
    Zou, Xiong
    Guo, Yi
    Mo, Zengnan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [40] Comprehensive Analyses Identify APOBEC3A as a Genomic Instability-Associated Immune Prognostic Biomarker in Ovarian Cancer
    Xu, Fangfang
    Liu, Tingwei
    Zhou, Zhuonan
    Zou, Chang
    Xu, Shaohua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12