Breast Cancer Prognostic Biomarker Using Attractor Metagenes and the FGD3-SUSD3 Metagene

被引:17
作者
Yang, Tai-Hsien Ou [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Wei-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Tian [3 ]
Maurer, Matthew A. [4 ]
Anastassiou, Dimitris [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Syst Biol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Elect Engn, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Stat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
EXPRESSION-BASED PREDICTORS; SIGNATURE; SURVIVAL; CONCORDANCE; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0399
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The winning model of the Sage Bionetworks/ DREAM Breast Cancer Prognosis Challenge made use of several molecular features, called attractor metagenes, as well as another metagene defined by the average expression level of the two genes FGD3 and SUSD3. This is a follow-up study toward developing a breast cancer prognostic test derived from and improving upon that model. Methods: We designed a feature selector facility calculating the prognostic scores of combinations of features, including those that we had used earlier, as well as those used in existing breast cancer biomarker assays, identifying the optimal selection of features for the test. Results: The resulting test, called BCAM( Breast Cancer Attractor Metagenes), is universally applicable to all clinical subtypes and stages of breast cancer and does not make any use of breast cancer molecular subtype or hormonal status information, none of which provided additional prognostic value. BCAM is composed of several molecular features: the breast cancer-specific FGD3-SUSD3 metagene, four attractor metagenes present in multiple cancer types ( CIN, MES, LYM, and END), three additional individual genes (CD68, DNAJB9, and CXCL12), tumor size, and the number of positive lymph nodes. Conclusions: Our analysis leads to the unexpected and remarkable suggestion that ER, PR, and HER2 status, or molecular subtype classification, do not provide additional prognostic value when the values of the FGD3-SUSD3 and attractor metagenes are taken into consideration. Impact: Our results suggest that BCAM's prognostic predictions show potential to outperform those resulting from existing breast cancer biomarker assays. (C)2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:2850 / 2856
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic impact of FOXP3 expression in triple-negative breast cancer
    Lee, Soohyeon
    Cho, Eun Yoon
    Park, Yeon Hee
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [22] Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of FOXP3+tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Daqing
    Gao, Zhaohua
    Cai, Zhengang
    Wang, Meixian
    He, Jianjun
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [23] SRSF3 Expression Serves as a Potential Biomarker for Prognostic and Immune Response in Pan-Cancer
    Li, Zihua
    Huang, Hui
    Wu, Xinbo
    Yu, Tao
    Xiao, Fajiao
    Zhou, Haichao
    Shang, Anquan
    Yang, Yunfeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [24] Transcription Factor Forkhead Box Protein 3 (FOXP3) as a Prognostic Indicator for Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer: Establishment of a Prognostic Nomogram
    Tan, Chunlei
    Xu, Jinling
    Zhang, Shiyuan
    Liu, Shuqiang
    Yang, Xiaotian
    Wu, Danping
    Yu, Boqian
    Huang, Yuanxi
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2024, 16 : 705 - 723
  • [25] Up-Frameshift Suppressor 3 as a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates: A pan-cancer analysis
    Xu, Jianduo
    Ma, Hongqing
    Shan, Baoen
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [26] Deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3 may be a potential prognostic biomarker associated with immune infiltration in colon cancer
    Liu, Jing
    Yi, Jingya
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Cao, Donglin
    Li, Lei
    Yao, Yachao
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (12): : 16513 - 16526
  • [27] Prognostic role of serum cancer antigen 15-3 in breast cancer patients with isolated bone metastases
    Turanli, Sevim
    Cetin, Abdullah
    BIOMARKERS, 2010, 15 (05) : 418 - 423
  • [28] Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis identified SLC16A3 as a potential prognostic and diagnostic biomarker
    Ping Yang
    Jiayu Yin
    Gongyin Zhang
    Xiaofeng Li
    Tongtong Chen
    Wanying Zhao
    Jinhai Tang
    Li Lv
    Xiupeng Lv
    Cancer Cell International, 25 (1)
  • [29] Over-expression of SRD5A3 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer
    Zhang, Yong-ping
    Na, Wen-ting
    Dai, Xiao-qiang
    Li, Ruo-fei
    Wang, Jian-xiong
    Gao, Ting
    Zhang, Wei-bo
    Xiang, Cheng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [30] Molecular subtypes are prognostic for N3 breast cancer patients in the modern therapeutic era
    Yersal, Ozlem
    Kaplan, Muhammed Ali
    Isikdogan, Abdurrahman
    Ozdemir, Nuriye
    Aliustaoglu, Mehmet
    Barutca, Sabri
    Erdogdu, Halil Ibrahim
    Meydan, Nezih
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (01) : 180 - 184