Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy with Automatic Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure versus Mini PCNL for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney

被引:17
作者
Deng, Xiaolin [1 ]
Xie, Donghua [1 ]
Huang, Xin [1 ]
Huang, Jianrong [1 ]
Song, Leming [1 ]
Du, Chuance [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Ganzhou Hosp, Ganzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal pelvic pressure; Kidney stone; Solitary kidney; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LITHOTRIPSY; LARGER;
D O I
10.1159/000521373
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes between suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy (SF-URL) with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for the management of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients with a solitary kidney who underwent SF-URL (n = 57) or MPCNL (n = 70) for large renal stones (>2 cm) between June 2015 and October 2020 were consecutively analyzed. The stone characteristics, operative times, stone-free rate (SFR), hospital stays, and incidences of complications were compared. Results: There was a significantly shorter operative time with MPCNL than with SF-URL (43.4 +/- 18.9 min vs. 61.8 +/- 21.1 min, p = 0.012). SFR at 30 days were 80.7% (46/57) and 90.0% (63/70) for SF-URL and MPCNL, respectively (p > 0.05). The SFR at the 3-month follow-up was comparable in both groups (91.2% vs. 95.7%, p > 0.05). The hemoglobin decline value, hospital stay, serum cystatin C, and percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions in the SF-URL group were obviously better than those in the MPCNL group: (0.8 +/- 0.4) versus (3.9 +/- 2.7) g/dL (p = 0.007), (3.6 +/- 1.5) versus (6.9 +/- 3.1) days (p = 0.013), (1.02 +/- 0.48) versus (2.54 +/- 0.69) mg/L (p = 0.011), and 0 (0.0%) versus 7 (10.0%) (p = 0.016), respectively. The percentages of patients with thrombosis and perirenal hematoma in the MPCNL group were higher than those in the SF-URL group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: For the treatment of 2-3-cm renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney, both SF-URL and MPCNL are effective. MPCNL has the advantage of a shorter operation time. However, SF-URL is characterized by less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, and less damage to kidney function.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients With Solitary Kidneys: A Single-center Experience
    Akman, Tolga
    Binbay, Murat
    Tekinarslan, Erdem
    Ozkuvanci, Unsal
    Kezer, Cem
    Erbin, Akif
    Berberoglu, Yalcin
    Yaser-Muslumanoglu, Ahmet
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (02) : 272 - 276
  • [2] Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
    Aldoukhi, Ali H.
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Hall, Timothy L.
    Roberts, William W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (12) : 1308 - 1312
  • [3] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Renal Stones in Patients With a Solitary Kidney
    Atis, Gokhan
    Gurbuz, Cenk
    Arikan, Ozgur
    Kilic, Mert
    Pelit, Sabri
    Canakci, Cengiz
    Gungor, Samet
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (02) : 290 - 294
  • [4] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones up to 2 cm in patients with solitary kidney: a single centre experience
    Bai, Yunjin
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Yang, Yubo
    Han, Ping
    Wang, Jia
    [J]. BMC Urology, 2017, 17
  • [5] The safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidney aging male patients: our single-center experience
    Besiroglu, Huseyin
    Merder, Erkan
    Dedekarginoglu, Galip
    [J]. AGING MALE, 2020, 23 (05) : 1134 - 1140
  • [6] A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: An Initial Experience of 93 Cases
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Song, Leming
    Xie, Donghua
    Fan, Difu
    Zhu, Lunfeng
    Yao, Lei
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Liu, Shaohua
    Zhang, Yonghua
    Liao, Xiaohui
    Liu, Shengfeng
    Peng, Zuofeng
    Hu, Min
    Zhu, Xianxin
    Huang, Jianrong
    Liu, Tairong
    Du, Chuance
    Guo, Shulin
    Yang, Zhongsheng
    Peng, Guanghua
    Ye, Zhangqun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (10) : 1067 - 1072
  • [7] Deng XL, 2016, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V9, P6563
  • [8] The Application of Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Pressure Control in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Calculi on Patients With a Solitary Kidney
    Huang, Jianrong
    Xie, Donghua
    Xiong, Ruiping
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Huang, Chengbing
    Fan, Difu
    Peng, Zuofeng
    Qin, Wen
    Zeng, Min
    Song, Leming
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 44 - 47
  • [9] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger than 2cm in Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Kehua
    Zhang, Peng
    Xu, Bin
    Luo, Guangheng
    Hu, Jianxing
    Zhu, Jianguo
    Sun, Fa
    [J]. UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (05) : 442 - 448
  • [10] Suctioning flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and supine lithotomy position: a comparative retrospective study
    Peng, Guanghua
    Song, Leming
    Xie, Donghua
    Huang, Jianrong
    Zhong, Yuming
    Tan, Wanlong
    Deng, Xiaolin
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (06) : 612 - 616