Differential item functioning of the functional independence measure in higher performing neurological patients

被引:29
作者
Dallmeijer, AJ
Dekker, J
Roorda, LD
Knol, DL
van Baalen, B
de Groot, V
Schepers, VPM
Lankhorst, GJ
机构
[1] VU Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] VU Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam, Inst Res Extramural Med, EMGO Inst, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] VU Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Rehabil Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
disability evaluation; neurological disorders; Rasch analysis; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1080/16501970510038284
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: When comparing outcomes of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM(TM)) between patient groups, item characteristics of the FIM(TM) should be consistent across groups. The purpose of this study was to compare item difficulty of the FIM(TM) in 3 patient groups with neurological disorders. Subjects: Patients with stroke (n = 295), multiple sclerosis ( n = 150), and traumatic brain injury ( n = 88). Methods: FIM(TM) scores were administered in each group. The FIM(TM) consists of a motor domain ( 13 items) and a cognitive domain ( 5 items). Rasch rating scale analysis was performed to investigate differences in item difficulty ( differential item functioning) between groups. Results: Answering categories of the FIM(TM) items were reduced to 3 ( from the original 7) because of disordered thresholds and low answering frequencies. Two items of the motor domain ("bladder" and "bowel") did not fit the Rasch model. For 7 out of the 11 fitting motor items, item difficulties were different between groups (i.e. showed differential item functioning). All cognitive items fitted the Rasch model, and 4 out of 5 cognitive items showed differential item functioning. Conclusion: Differential item functioning is present in several items of both the motor and cognitive domain of the FIM(TM). Adjustments for differential item functioning may be required when FIM(TM) data will be compared between groups or will be used in a pooled data analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 352
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[2]   Evaluating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation: Choosing a discriminative measure [J].
Brock, KA ;
Goldie, PA ;
Greenwood, KM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (01) :92-99
[3]   RASCH ANALYSIS FOR OUTCOMES MEASURES - SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
CHANG, WC ;
CHAN, C .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (10) :934-939
[4]  
Dickson HG, 1996, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V28, P159
[5]   PERFORMANCE PROFILES OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE [J].
GRANGER, CV ;
HAMILTON, BB ;
LINACRE, JM ;
HEINEMANN, AW ;
WRIGHT, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1993, 72 (02) :84-89
[6]  
HAMILTON BB, 2003, UNIFORM NATL DATA SY, P137
[7]   Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis [J].
Hawley, CA ;
Taylor, R ;
Hellawell, DJ ;
Pentland, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 67 (06) :749-754
[8]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IMPAIRMENT AND PHYSICAL-DISABILITY AS MEASURED BY THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE [J].
HEINEMANN, AW ;
LINACRE, JM ;
WRIGHT, BD ;
HAMILTON, BB ;
GRANGER, C .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1993, 74 (06) :566-573
[9]  
Keith R A, 1987, Adv Clin Rehabil, V1, P6
[10]  
KIM JO, 1996, INTRO FACTOR ANAL WH