Cost-Effectiveness of White Blood Cell Growth Factor Use among a Large Nationwide Cohort of Elderly Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Treated with Chemotherapy

被引:7
作者
Gruschkus, Stephen K. [1 ,2 ]
Lairson, David [3 ]
Dunn, J. Kay
Risser, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Du, Xianglin L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Sch Publ Hlth, Div Dis Control, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Cancer; Cost-effectiveness; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors; Outcomes research; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; ACCEPTABILITY CURVES; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; PROPENSITY SCORES; CANCER; UNCERTAINTY; SUBCLASSIFICATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; UPDATE; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness (as measured as cost per life-year saved) of white blood cell growth factor or colony-stimulating factor (CSF) use among a large cohort of elderly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients in a real-world setting. Methods: We identified 13,203 NHL patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database who received the diagnosis from 1992 to 2002 and who received chemotherapy within 12 months of diagnosis. Benefit (effectiveness) of CSF use (primary and secondary prophylaxis) was measured as observed improvement in overall survival. Costs for each patient were calculated by adding the cumulative reimbursement amounts from Medicare claims. Cost-effectiveness was estimated by modeling the joint influence of CSF use on both costs and effectiveness using a propensity-score net monetary benefit approach. Results: Primary prophylactic CSF use was cost-effective at lower willingness-to-pay thresholds, whereas at higher thresholds, not providing prophylactic CSF became the cost-effective strategy. For secondary prophylactic CSF use among patients experiencing neutropenia, fever, and/or infection, the opposite trend was observed. For low willingness-to-pay thresholds (<$20,000 per life-year gained), not administering CSF was the cost-effective strategy, whereas CSF use became cost-effective as willingness to pay increased (from $100,000+ per life-year gained). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first large population-based study to empirically measure the cost-effectiveness of CSF among NHL patients treated with chemotherapy. CSF use as primary or secondary prophylaxis may be a cost-effective strategy depending on society's (or payers') willingness to pay for improvements in outcomes. Copyright (C) 2011, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) :485-485
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2015
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SURV EP END RES SEER
[4]  
Björkholm M, 1999, BLOOD, V94, p599A
[5]   Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF in patients with malignant lymphoma: a systematic review [J].
Bohlius, J ;
Reiser, M ;
Schwarzer, G ;
Engert, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2003, 122 (03) :413-423
[6]  
Bohlius J, 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V8, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003189.PUB4.2008
[7]   The death of cost-minimization analysis? [J].
Briggs, AH ;
O'Brien, BJ .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 10 (02) :179-184
[8]  
Brown ML, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P104
[9]   Changes in cancer registry coding for lymphoma subtypes: Reliability over time and relevance for surveillance and study [J].
Clarke, CA ;
Undurraga, DM ;
Harasty, PJ ;
Glaser, SL ;
Morton, LM ;
Holly, EA .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (04) :630-638
[10]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ADJUSTMENT BY SUBCLASSIFICATION IN REMOVING BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) :295-&