Validation of immunoassays used to assess immunogenicity to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

被引:53
作者
Geng, D [1 ]
Shankar, G [1 ]
Schantz, A [1 ]
Rajadhyaksha, M [1 ]
Davis, H [1 ]
Wagner, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Centocor Inc, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Expt Med, Radnor, PA 19087 USA
关键词
immunogenicity; enzyme immunoassay; anti-drug antibody; assay validation; method validation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2005.04.045
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Immunogenicity has always been an important consideration in the evaluation of pharmaceutical protein biologics. In this article, method validation parameters relevant to enzyme immunoassays are described for assays applied to the analysis of anti-drug antibodies, with special considerations for immunogenicity to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Common strategies for experimental investigation of various validation parameters are proposed. In addition, a novel, yet simple, approach is proposed to categorize the validation effort into two mutually interdependent phases, based on the characterization of validation parameters as "system descriptive" or "system controlled". System descriptive parameters are those that must be characterized but need not have pre-specified acceptance criteria for assay validation. In contrast, system-controlled parameters should be understood early in assay development, and optimized and confirmed using a priori acceptance criteria in validation to assure sufficient control over them during routine bioanalysis. This approach not only streamlines the validation process but also eliminates unnecessary redundancies. This validation method can be achieved with proper scientific rigor and remain within the realm of GLP compliance. The authors hope that other research groups would engage in discussions on validation of anti-drug antibody assays in order to establish a consistent approach across the industry and academia. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 375
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, GUID IND BIOAN METH
  • [2] *ICH, P INT C HARM ICH TEC
  • [3] Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products
    Mire-Sluis, AR
    Barrett, YC
    Devanarayan, V
    Koren, E
    Liu, H
    Maia, M
    Parish, T
    Scott, G
    Shankar, G
    Shores, E
    Swanson, SJ
    Taniguchi, G
    Wierda, D
    Zuckerman, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 289 (1-2) : 1 - 16
  • [4] Pendley C, 2003, CURR OPIN MOL THER, V5, P172
  • [5] Schaller J L, 2001, MedGenMed, V3, P1
  • [6] Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: Clinical implications and future prospects
    Schellekens, H
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (11) : 1720 - 1740
  • [7] ANALYTICAL METHODS VALIDATION - BIOAVAILABILITY, BIOEQUIVALENCE, AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES
    SHAH, VP
    MIDHA, KK
    DIGHE, S
    MCGILVERAY, IJ
    SKELLY, JP
    YACOBI, A
    LAYLOFF, T
    VISWANATHAN, CT
    COOK, CE
    MCDOWALL, RD
    PITTMAN, KA
    SPECTOR, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1992, 81 (03) : 309 - 312
  • [8] Strategies for detection, measurement and characterization of unwanted antibodies induced by therapeutic biologicals
    Wadhwa, M
    Bird, C
    Dilger, P
    Gaines-Das, R
    Thorpe, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 278 (1-2) : 1 - 17
  • [9] 1997, P INT C HARM ICH TEC
  • [10] 2002, US PHARMACOPEIA NATL