The effectiveness of coal fly-ash to decrease phosphorus loss from grassland soils

被引:15
作者
McDowell, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] AgRes Ltd, Invermay Agr Ctr, Mosgiel, New Zealand
来源
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH | 2005年 / 43卷 / 07期
关键词
sediment; overland flow; particulate P; grazing; pasture; cropland;
D O I
10.1071/SR05021
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Phosphorus (P) loss from soils can impair surface water quality. A study was conducted to test the efficacy of fly-ash to decrease phosphorus loss in 11 grassland soils. A preliminary toxicity and leaching experiment indicated that heavy metal concentrations (As, Cd, Pb, Se) in leachate and pasture from a soil treated with ash up to 50 mg/kg were not different from the control (unamended soil). Heavy metal concentrations in the ash were generally below limits for maximum concentrations in soil. Following incubation of fly ash at a rate of 20 mg/kg for 3 months with 11 grassland soils packed into boxes, overland flow was generated by simulated rainfall on each boxed soil. Analysis of overland flow indicated that in 2 semi-arid soils, P loss decreased due to decreased particulate P (PP) loss and low organic C concentration (<20 g/kg) that facilitated soil dispersion and slaking and increased soil strength. However, in 4 other soils (including 3 volcanic-ash soils with organic C > 70 g/kg), P loss increased due to increased soil pH from 6 to 7 where P is most soluble. In all soils, despite an increase in P in recalcitrant soil P fractions, increased soil pH stimulated soil C and P mineralisation (decreased organic C by, on average, 4.1 g/kg), decreased soil organic P, and increased inorganic P in labile fractions. It is concluded that the application of fly-ash from this source should not be used as an amendment to decrease P loss in pastures where soil pH is commonly <6.0, but could provide useful both as a supplement to lime and in mitigating P loss in cropping soils.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 860
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CAN ENV QUAL GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1954, ESTIMATION AVAILABLE
[3]  
*ANZECC, 2000, AUSTR NZ GUID FRESH, V2
[4]  
ANZECC and ARMCANZ, 2000, NATL WATER QUALITY M, V1
[5]  
Brady NC, 1974, NATURE PROPERTIES SO
[6]   Assessing the efficacy of alternative phosphorus sorbing soil amendments [J].
Callahan, MP ;
Kleinman, PJA ;
Sharpley, AN ;
Stout, WL .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2002, 167 (08) :539-547
[7]   The breakdown of water repellency and solute transport through a hydrophobic soil [J].
Clothier, BE ;
Vogeler, I ;
Magesan, GN .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 231 :255-264
[8]   CHEMICAL NATURE OF ORGANIC PHOSPHORUS IN CULTIVATED AND UNCULTIVATED SOILS UNDER DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTAL-CONDITIONS [J].
CONDRON, LM ;
FROSSARD, E ;
TIESSEN, H ;
NEWMAN, RH ;
STEWART, JWB .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1990, 41 (01) :41-50
[9]   FLY-ASH, BASIC SLAG AND GLENBROOK SLAG TOXICITY IN CATTLE [J].
DEWES, HF ;
MCLEAY, LM ;
HARFOOT, CG .
NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1995, 43 (03) :104-109
[10]   Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review [J].
Haynes, RJ ;
Naidu, R .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 51 (02) :123-137