A machine learning investigation of factors that contribute to predicting cognitive performance: Difficulty level, reaction time and eye-movements

被引:17
作者
Bachurina, Valentina [1 ]
Sushchinskaya, Svetlana [2 ]
Sharaev, Maxim [2 ]
Burnaev, Evgeny [2 ]
Arsalidou, Marie [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia
[2] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol, Moscow, Russia
[3] York Univ, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Eye-tracking; Machine learning; Mental attention; Cognitive demand; Objective difficulty; INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; ATTENTION; WORKING; MEMORY; IMPAIRMENT; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2021.113713
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Predicting accuracy in cognitively challenging tasks has potential applications in education and industry. Task demand has been linked with increases in response time and variations in reaction time and eye-tracking metrics, however, machine learning research has not been used to predict performance on tasks with multiple levels of difficulty. We report data on adult participants who performed tasks of mental attentional capacity with six levels of difficulty and use machine learning methods to predict accuracy scores considering metrics associated with task difficulty, reaction time and eye movements. Results show that machine learning models can robustly predict performance with reaction times and difficulty level being the strongest predictors. Eye-tracking indices can also predict accuracy independently, with the most important features of the model driven by the number of fixations, number of saccades, duration of the current fixation and pupil size. Practical and theoretical implications of the results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Executive functions underlying multiplicative reasoning: Problem type matters [J].
Agostino, Alba ;
Johnson, Janice ;
Pascual-Leone, Juan .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 105 (04) :286-305
[2]   AN INTRODUCTION TO KERNEL AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION [J].
ALTMAN, NS .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) :175-185
[3]   Mental Workload and Visual Impairment: Differences between Pupil, Blink, and Subjective Rating [J].
Angel Recarte, Miguel ;
Perez, Elisa ;
Conchillo, Angela ;
Miguel Nunes, Luis .
SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 11 (02) :374-385
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, DOI [DOI 10.1145/985921.986094, 10.1145/985921.986094]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PROC 22 ACM SIGKDD I, DOI DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785
[6]   A balancing act of the brain: activations and deactivations driven by cognitive load [J].
Arsalidou, Marie ;
Pascual-Leone, Juan ;
Johnson, Janice ;
Morris, Drew ;
Taylor, Margot J. .
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2013, 3 (03) :273-285
[7]   Misleading cues improve developmental assessment of working memory capacity: The color matching tasks [J].
Arsalidou, Marie ;
Pascual-Leone, Juan ;
Johnson, Janice .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 25 (03) :262-277
[8]   TASK-EVOKED PUPILLARY RESPONSES, PROCESSING LOAD, AND THE STRUCTURE OF PROCESSING RESOURCES [J].
BEATTY, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) :276-292
[9]   GTApprox: Surrogate modeling for industrial design [J].
Belyaev, Mikhail ;
Burnaev, Evgeny ;
Kapushev, Ermek ;
Panov, Maxim ;
Prikhodko, Pavel ;
Vetrov, Dmitry ;
Yarotsky, Dmitry .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2016, 102 :29-39
[10]   Intraindividual Variability in Reaction Time Predicts Cognitive Outcomes 5 Years Later [J].
Bielak, Allison A. M. ;
Hultsch, David F. ;
Strauss, Esther ;
MacDonald, Stuart W. S. ;
Hunter, Michael A. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) :731-741