Towards model predictive control: online predictions of ammonium and nitrate removal by using a stochastic ASM

被引:24
作者
Stentoft, Peter Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Munk-Nielsen, Thomas [1 ]
Vezzaro, Luca [1 ,3 ]
Madsen, Henrik [2 ]
Mikkelsen, Peter Steen [3 ]
Moller, Jan Kloppenborg [2 ]
机构
[1] Kruger AS, Veolia Water Technol, Soborg, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Appl Math & Comp Sci, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
activated sludge process (ASP); grey-box model; MPC; prediction; stochastic differential equations; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE PROCESSES; WASTE-WATER; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SYSTEMS; PLANT; IDENTIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2018.527
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Online model predictive control (MPC) of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) requires simple and fast models to improve the operation of energy-demanding processes, such as aeration for nitrogen removal. Selected elements of the activated sludge model number 1 modelling framework for ammonium and nitrate removal were included in discretely observed stochastic differential equations in which online data are assimilated to update the model states. This allows us to produce model-based predictions including uncertainty in real time while it also reduces the number of parameters compared to many detailed models. It introduces only a small residual error when used to predict ammonium and nitrate concentrations in a small recirculating WRRF facility. The error when predicting 2 min ahead corresponds to the uncertainty from the sensors. When predicting 24 hours ahead the mean relative residual error increases to similar to 10% and similar to 20% for ammonium and nitrate concentrations respectively. Consequently this is considered a first step towards stochastic MPC of the aeration process. Ultimately this can reduce electricity demand and cost for water resource recovery, allowing the prioritization of aeration during periods of cheaper electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 62
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, J HYDROINFORM
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOL WASTEWATER TREA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 13 IWA
[4]  
Bechmann H, 2000, ENVIRONMETRICS, V11, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(200001/02)11:1<1::AID-ENV377>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-N
[6]  
Cadet C., 2014, IFAC Proc., V47, P7134, DOI DOI 10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01140
[7]   STATISTICAL IDENTIFICATION OF MONOD-KINETIC PARAMETERS FROM ONLINE MEASUREMENTS [J].
CARSTENSEN, J ;
HARREMOES, F ;
MADSEN, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 31 (02) :125-133
[8]  
Carstensen J., 1994, THESIS
[9]   New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling [J].
Corominas, Li. ;
Rieger, L. ;
Takacs, I. ;
Ekama, G. ;
Hauduc, H. ;
Vanrolleghem, P. A. ;
Oehmen, A. ;
Gernaey, K. V. ;
van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. ;
Comeau, Y. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (04) :841-857
[10]  
CTSM-R, 2018, CTSMR CONT TIM STOCH