Linking Personality Traits to Individual Differences in Affective Spaces

被引:7
|
作者
Levine, Seth M. [1 ]
Alahaeivaelae, Aino L., I [1 ]
Wechsler, Theresa F. [2 ]
Wackerle, Anja [1 ]
Rupprecht, Rainer [1 ]
Schwarzbach, Jens, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Regensburg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
affective science; Big Five; clustering; emotions; individual differences; personality; EMOTION REGULATION; NEURAL REPRESENTATION; CATEGORY REPRESENTATIONS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ANXIETY; NEUROTICISM; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; DYSREGULATION; EXTROVERSION; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00448
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Different individuals respond differently to emotional stimuli in their environment. Therefore, to understand how emotions are represented mentally will ultimately require investigations into individual-level information. Here we tasked participants with freely arranging emotionally charged images on a computer screen according to their subjective emotional similarity (yielding a unique affective space for each participant) and subsequently sought external validity of the layout of the individuals' affective spaces through the five-factor personality model (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness) assessed via the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Applying agglomerative hierarchical clustering to the group-level affective space revealed a set of underlying affective clusters whose within-cluster dissimilarity, per individual, was then correlated with individuals' personality scores. These cluster-based analyses predominantly revealed that the dispersion of the negative cluster showed a positive relationship with Neuroticism and a negative relationship with Conscientiousness, a finding that would be predicted by prior work. Such results demonstrate the non-spurious structure of individualized emotion information revealed by data-driven analyses of a behavioral task (and validated by incorporating psychological measures of personality) and corroborate prior knowledge of the interaction between affect and personality. Future investigations can similarly combine hypothesis- and data-driven methods to extend such findings, potentially yielding new perspectives on underlying cognitive processes, disease susceptibility, or even diagnostic/prognostic markers for mental disorders involving emotion dysregulation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条