Distributed situation awareness: From awareness in individuals and teams to the awareness of technologies, sociotechnical systems, and societies

被引:18
作者
Salmon, Paul M. [1 ]
Plant, Katherine L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Transportat Res Grp, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Situation awareness; Distributed situation awareness; Distributed cognition; Systems thinking; Sociotechnical systems; DRIVER; MODELS; RISK; PARADIGM; COMMAND; ERROR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103599
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A large component of Neville Stanton's work has focused on situation awareness in domains such as defence, transport, and process control. A significant contribution has been to initiate a shift from considering individual human operator situation awareness to considering the situation awareness of human and non-human teams, organisations, and even sociotechnical systems. Though controversial when introduced, the distributed situation awareness model has become increasingly relevant for modern day systems and problems. In this article we reflect on Stanton's contribution and point to a pressing need to consider a. The situation awareness of advanced technologies, and b. situation awareness at a sociotechnical system, societal and even global level. This is demonstrated via discussion on two contemporaneous issues: automated vehicles and the COVID-19 pandemic. It is concluded that, given advances such as artificial intelligence, the increased connectedness of society, emerging issues such as disinformation, and an increasing set of global threats, Stanton's distributed situation awareness model and associated analysis framework provide a useful toolkit for future Human Factors and Ergonomics applications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Distributed situation awareness: a health-system approach to assessing and designing patient flow management
    Alhaider, Abdulrahman A.
    Lau, Nathan
    Davenport, Paul B.
    Morris, Melanie K.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2020, 63 (06) : 682 - 709
  • [2] Artman H., 1998, P 9 C COGNITIVE ERGO, P151
  • [3] Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats
    Aven, Terje
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 205
  • [4] Understanding the COVID 19 Conundrum and Decluttering the scientific literature on COVID 19
    Bagaria, Vaibhav
    Vaishya, Raju
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2021, 15 (04)
  • [5] Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016
    Banks, Victoria A.
    Plant, Katherine L.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 108 : 278 - 285
  • [6] Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future
    Banks, Victoria A.
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 53 : 389 - 395
  • [7] Description of dynamic shared knowledge: an exploratory study during a competitive team sports interaction
    Bourbousson, J.
    Poizat, G.
    Saury, J.
    Seve, C.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2011, 54 (02) : 120 - 138
  • [8] Awareness of pandemics and the impact of COVID-19
    Buesa, Alejandro
    Perez, Javier J.
    Santabarbara, Daniel
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 204
  • [9] Who do you trust? The digital destruction of shared situational awareness and the COVID-19 infodemic
    Bunker, Deborah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 55 (55)
  • [10] Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'
    Catchpole, Ken
    Bisantz, Ann
    Hallbeck, M. Susan
    Weigl, Matthias
    Randell, Rebecca
    Kossack, Merrick
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 270 - 276