Cognitive engagement with technology scale: a validation study

被引:7
作者
Vongkulluksn, Vanessa W. [1 ]
Lu, Lin [2 ]
Nelson, Michael J. [3 ]
Xie, Kui [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Coll Educ, Learning Sci Program, 4505 South Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Coll Educ, Learning Analyt, 4505 South Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Educ Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2022年 / 70卷 / 02期
关键词
Cognitive engagement; Technology integration; Scale validation; Bloom's digital taxonomy; DIGITAL NATIVES; SELF-EFFICACY; TOOL-USE; TEACHERS; INTEGRATION; CLASSROOMS; BARRIERS; METAANALYSIS; ACCEPTANCE; DOCUMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-022-10098-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Quantitative studies on technology integration often examined general quantity of classroom technology use or teacher-reported accounts of integration practices. There is a current need for a measurement tool that links students' technology use and cognitive engagement, which will allow researchers to better illustrate how technology is woven into the learning process. The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to measure how students use technology for different cognitive tasks, following theoretical conceptions from Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and Multiple-Document Task-based Relevance Assessment and Content Extraction. We employed Confirmatory Factor Analysis, as well as both classical test theory and item response theory over three studies to validate our newly created scale. The new Cognitive Engagement with Technology (CET) scale showed good psychometric properties, item functioning, and construct validity. The CET scale can be used to triangulate students' technology use patterns with other research methods. It can also help extend past findings by taking into account how students use technology to aid in the cognitive processes of learning.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 445
页数:27
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P11, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-69746-32, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-32]
[3]  
Al-Adwan AA., 2013, INT J ED DEV USING I, V9, P2
[4]  
Anderson LW., 2001, Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete, Vcomplete
[5]   Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: online comprehension processes and offline products [J].
Anmarkrud, Oistein ;
McCrudden, Matthew T. ;
Braten, Ivar ;
Stromso, Helge I. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2013, 41 (05) :873-894
[6]  
[Anonymous], ROUTLEDGE HDB DISCOU
[7]  
Barron A. E., 2003, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, V35, P489
[8]   Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial [J].
Bockenholt, Ulf ;
Meiser, Thorsten .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (01) :159-181
[9]   Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays [J].
Braten, Ivar ;
Ferguson, Leila E. ;
Stromso, Helge I. ;
Anmarkrud, Oistein .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 84 (01) :58-85
[10]   The Effects of Instruction on Students' Generation of Self-Questions When Reading Multiple Documents [J].
Cameron, Chelsea ;
Van Meter, Peggy ;
Long, Valerie A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2017, 85 (02) :334-351