Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the 'Sepsis Six' bundle

被引:17
作者
Burke, John [1 ]
Wood, Sally [2 ,3 ]
Hermon, Andrew [2 ]
Szakmany, Tamas [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cwm Taf Univ Hlth Board, Royal Glamorgan Hosp, ACT Directorate, Llantrisant, Wales
[2] Cwm Taf Univ Hlth Board, Royal Glamorgan Hosp, Llantrisant, Wales
[3] Nottingham Univ Hosp, QMC, Nottingham, England
[4] Cardiff Univ, Div Populat Med, Dept Anaesthesia Intens Care & Pain Med, Heath Pk Campus, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[5] Aneurin Bevan Univ Hlth Board, Royal Gwent Hosp, Crit Care Directorate, Newport, Gwent, Wales
关键词
Critical care without walls/outreach; Sepsis; INTENSIVE-CARE; RESUSCITATION BUNDLE; GENERAL WARDS; ORGAN FAILURE; SHOCK; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; IMPLEMENTATION; DEFINITIONS; PREVALENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.12358
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background The Sepsis Six bundle is designed to facilitate early intervention with three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to be delivered within 1 h to patients with suspected sepsis. Aims and objectives To investigate the effects of delivering the 'Sepsis Six' bundle by the Critical Care Outreach team on patient outcomes. Design In a prospective observational study, all adult patients on the general wards from June 2012 to January 2014 with sepsis who were screened and treated by the Critical Care Outreach team were included. Methods The main outcome measure was the change in National Early Warning Score following the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle within 24 h. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality and overall bundle compliance. Results A total of 207 patients were included in the analysis. Overall bundle compliance was 84%. National Early Warning Scores decreased significantly 24 h after administering the Sepsis Six, from 7 center dot 4 +/- 2 center dot 6 to 3 center dot 1 +/- 2 center dot 4 (p < 0 center dot 001). The distribution of the National Early Warning Score changed significantly. Mortality was lower at 90 days when patients who presented with signs of sepsis within 48 h of hospital admission were compared with those who presented with signs of sepsis after 48 h of hospital admission (14 center dot 5% versus 35 center dot 4% p < 0 center dot 03) despite similar baseline physiological variables. Conclusions We found better outcomes after the administration of Sepsis Six. Reliable delivery of the bundle, defined as 80% of patients receiving the standard of care, is achievable, and our quality improvement data suggest that it is likely to be sustainable in our environment. Relevance to clinical practice Sepsis Six can reduce physiological impairment, monitored by the National Early Warning Scores. Consistent delivery of the bundle can lead to better patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Effects of Fluid Resuscitation With Colloids vs Crystalloids on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Presenting With Hypovolemic Shock The CRISTAL Randomized Trial [J].
Annane, Djillali ;
Siami, Shidasp ;
Jaber, Samir ;
Martin, Claude ;
Elatrous, Souheil ;
Declere, Adrien Descorps ;
Preiser, Jean Charles ;
Outin, Herve ;
Troche, Gilles ;
Charpentier, Claire ;
Trouillet, Jean Louis ;
Kimmoun, Antoine ;
Forceville, Xavier ;
Darmon, Michael ;
Lesur, Olivier ;
Regnier, Jean ;
Abroug, Fekri ;
Berger, Philippe ;
Clec'h, Christophe ;
Cousson, Joel ;
Thibault, Laure ;
Chevret, Sylvie .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (17) :1809-1817
[2]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[3]   A flowchart for building evidence-based care bundles in intensive care: based on a systematic review [J].
Borgert, Marjon ;
Binnekade, Jan ;
Paulus, Frederique ;
Goossens, Astrid ;
Dongelmans, Dave .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 29 (02) :163-175
[4]   Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Snyder, Ashley ;
Han, Xuan ;
Sokol, Sarah ;
Pettit, Natasha ;
Howell, Michael D. ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195 (07) :906-911
[5]   Utility of a single early warning score in patients with sepsis in the emergency department [J].
Corfield, Alasdair R. ;
Lees, Fiona ;
Zealley, Ian ;
Houston, Gordon ;
Dickie, Sarah ;
Ward, Kirsty ;
McGuffie, Crawford .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (06) :482-487
[6]   The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study [J].
Daniels, Ron ;
Nutbeam, Tim ;
McNamara, Georgina ;
Galvin, Clare .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (06) :507-512
[7]   Surviving the first hours in sepsis: getting the basics right (an intensivist's perspective) [J].
Daniels, Ron .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 :II11-II23
[8]  
DELLINGER RP, 2013, INTENS CARE MED, V39, P165, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8
[9]   Sepsis incidence and outcome:: Contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward [J].
Esteban, Andres ;
Frutos-Vivar, Fernando ;
Ferguson, Niall D. ;
Penuelas, Oscar ;
Lorente, Jose Angel ;
Gordo, Federico ;
Honrubia, Teresa ;
Algora, Alejandro ;
Bustos, Alejandra ;
Garcia, Gema ;
Rodriguez Diaz-Reganon, Inmaculada ;
Ruiz de Luna, Rafael .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (05) :1284-1289
[10]   Assessment of disease-severity scoring systems for patients with sepsis in general internal medicine departments [J].
Ghanem-Zoubi, Nesrin O. ;
Vardi, Moshe ;
Laor, Arie ;
Weber, Gabriel ;
Bitterman, Haim .
CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (02)