Repeated Clinical Assessment Using Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique for Diagnosis in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness

被引:4
作者
da Conceicao Teixeira, Liliana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blacker, Danielle [4 ]
Campos, Carlos [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Garrett, Carolina [3 ]
Duport, Sophie [6 ]
Rocha, Nuno Barbosa [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Leiria, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Innovat Care & Hlth Technol, Leiria, Portugal
[2] Polytech Inst Porto, Sch Hlth, Ctr Rehabil Res, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Royal Hosp Neurodisabil, Occupat Therapy Dept, London, England
[5] Univ Porto, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Lab Neuropsychophysiol, Porto, Portugal
[6] Royal Hosp Neurodisabil, Res Dept, London, England
关键词
assessment; diagnosis; disorders of consciousness; minimally conscious state; vegetative state (unresponsive wakefulness syndrome); DETECTING AWARENESS; VEGETATIVE STATE; SMART; COMA;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2021.728637
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Purpose: The recommended way to assess consciousness in prolonged disorders of consciousness is to observe the patient's responses to sensory stimulation. Multiple assessment sessions have to be completed in order to reach a correct diagnosis. There is, however, a lack of data on how many sessions are sufficient for validity and reliability. The aim of this study was to identify the number of Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART) assessment sessions needed to reach a reliable diagnosis. A secondary objective was to identify which sensory stimulation modalities are more useful to reach a diagnosis.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the adult patients (who received a SMART assessment) admitted to a specialist brain injury unit over the course of 4 years was conducted (n = 35). An independent rater analyzed the SMART levels for each modality and session and provided a suggestive diagnosis based on the highest SMART level per session.Results: For the vast majority of patients between 5 and 6 sessions was sufficient to reach the final clinical diagnosis. The visual, auditory, tactile, and motor function modalities were found to be more associated with the final diagnosis than the olfactory and gustatory modalities.Conclusion: These findings provide for the first time a rationale for optimizing the time spent on assessing patients using SMART.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit [J].
Andrews, K ;
Murphy, L ;
Munday, R ;
Littlewood, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) :13-16
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]   Chronic disorders of consciousness [J].
Bernat, JL .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9517) :1181-1192
[4]   Coma and Disorders of Consciousness: Scientific Advances and Practical Considerations for Clinicians [J].
Bodart, Olivier ;
Laureys, Steven ;
Gosseries, Olivia .
SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2013, 33 (02) :83-90
[5]   From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness [J].
Bruno, Marie-Aurelie ;
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey ;
Thibaut, Aurore ;
Moonen, Gustave ;
Laureys, Steven .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 258 (07) :1373-1384
[6]  
Childs NL, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P944
[7]   Coma recovery scale-r: variability in the disorder of consciousness [J].
Cortese, M. D. ;
Riganello, F. ;
Arcuri, F. ;
Pugliese, M. E. ;
Lucca, L. F. ;
Dolce, G. ;
Sannita, W. G. .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 15
[8]  
Fins Joseph J, 2016, AMA J Ethics, V18, P1182, DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.ecas2-1612
[9]   Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegetative and minimally conscious states [J].
Giacino, JT ;
Kalmar, K .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 15 (3-4) :166-174
[10]   The minimally conscious state - Definition and diagnostic criteria [J].
Giacino, JT ;
Ashwal, S ;
Childs, N ;
Cranford, R ;
Jennett, B ;
Katz, DI ;
Kelly, JP ;
Rosenberg, JH ;
Whyte, J ;
Zafonte, RD ;
Zasler, ND .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (03) :349-353