Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different fissure sealants to bovine enamel

被引:14
作者
Sen Tunc, E. [1 ]
Bayrak, S. [1 ]
Tuloglu, N. [1 ]
Ertas, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Paediat Dent, Fac Dent, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Fac Dent, TR-55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
Adhesive systems; amorphous calcium phosphate; bond strength; fissure sealants; preventive dentistry; IN-VITRO MICROLEAKAGE; PERMANENT ENAMEL; ADHESIVE; PIT; DURABILITY; PERFORMANCE; TISSUE; RESIN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01639.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of a new fissure sealant and compare it with conventional sealants which are applied to enamel alone, and also with self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives. Methods: Enamel specimens were prepared and randomly distributed into three groups according to fissure sealant (Aegis, Helioseal F, Helioseal Clear). Each group was then subdivided according to adhesive system (Clearfil S3, Single Bond, no adhesive). A universal testing machine was used to measure lTBS, and data were analysed using one- way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Results: lTBS values for all Aegis subgroups were significantly lower than for comparable Helioseal F and Helioseal Clear subgroups (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in lTBS of Helioseal F and Helioseal Clear (p > 0.05). In the Helioseal Clear group, lTBS values for Single Bond were significantly higher than for Clearfil S3 (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the lTBS values of the adhesive subgroups in the Aegis or Helioseal F groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Sealant lTBS values may be affected by material content. The addition of an adhesive may improve lTBS values of sealant to enamel.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Asselin ME, 2009, PEDIATR DENT, V31, P323
  • [2] In-vitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets
    Behnan, Scott M.
    Arruda, Airton O.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas, Carlos
    Sohn, Woosung
    Peters, Mathilde C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (06) : 712.e1 - 712.e7
  • [3] Borges Márcio Antônio Paraizo, 2007, Braz. Dent. J., V18, P113, DOI 10.1590/S0103-64402007000200005
  • [4] A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results
    De Munck, J
    Van Landuyt, K
    Peumans, M
    Poitevin, A
    Lambrechts, P
    Braem, M
    Van Meerbeek, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2005, 84 (02) : 118 - 132
  • [5] SUITABILITY OF HUMAN, BOVINE, EQUINE, AND OVINE TOOTH ENAMEL FOR STUDIES OF ARTIFICIAL BACTERIAL CARIOUS LESIONS
    EDMUNDS, DH
    WHITTAKER, DK
    GREEN, RM
    [J]. CARIES RESEARCH, 1988, 22 (06) : 327 - 336
  • [6] Feigal RJ, 2006, PEDIATR DENT, V28, P143
  • [7] Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: A clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems
    Feigal, RJ
    Musherure, P
    Gillespie, B
    Levy-Polack, M
    Quelhas, I
    Hebling, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (11) : 1850 - 1856
  • [8] RETAINING SEALANT ON - SALIVARY CONTAMINATED ENAMEL
    FEIGAL, RJ
    HITT, J
    SPLIETH, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 124 (03) : 88 - &
  • [9] Garcia-Godoy F, 1997, J Clin Pediatr Dent, V22, P45
  • [10] Henderson HZ, 1999, DENT CHILD ADOLESCEN, P373