A National Model for Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating Evidence-based Guidelines for Prehospital Care

被引:51
作者
Lang, Eddy S. [1 ]
Spaite, Daniel W. [2 ]
Oliver, Zoe J. [3 ]
Gotschall, Catherine S. [4 ]
Swor, Robert A. [5 ]
Dawson, Drew E. [4 ]
Hunt, Richard C. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Emergency Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Arizona Emergency Med Res Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Emergency Med, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] Natl Highway Traff Safety Adm US, Off Emergency Med Serv, Washington, DC 20590 USA
[5] Oakland Univ, William Beaumont Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Injury Response, Natl Ctr Injury Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
OF-HOSPITAL OUTCOMES; ADVANCED LIFE-SUPPORT; AGREE II; HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY; GRADE; FRAMEWORK; STRENGTH; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01281.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In 2007, the Institute of Medicines (IOMs) Committee on the Future of Emergency Care recommended that a multidisciplinary panel establish a model for developing evidence-based protocols for the treatment of emergency medical systems (EMS) patients. In response, the National EMS Advisory Council (NEMSAC) and the Federal Interagency Committee on EMS (FICEMS) convened a panel of multidisciplinary experts to review current strategies for developing evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) and to propose a model for developing such guidelines for the prehospital milieu. This paper describes the eight-step model endorsed by FICEMS, NEMSAC, and a panel of EMS and evidence-based medicine experts. According to the model, prehospital EBG development would begin with the input of evidence from various external sources. Potential EBG topics would be suggested following a preliminary evidentiary review; those topics with sufficient extant foundational evidence would be selected for development. Next, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology would be used to determine a quality-of-evidence rating and a strength of recommendation related to the patient care guidelines. More specific, contextualized patient care protocols would then be generated and disseminated to the EMS community. After educating EMS professionals using targeted teaching materials, the protocols would be implemented in local EMS systems. Finally, effectiveness and uptake would be measured with integrated quality improvement and outcomes monitoring systems. The constituencies and experts involved in the model development process concluded that the use of such transparent, objective, and scientifically rigorous guidelines could significantly increase the quality of EMS care in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, BMC MED INFORM DECIS, DOI DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-5-23
[2]  
[Anonymous], APPR GUID RES EV AGR
[3]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCI STAT PRACT GUID
[5]  
[Anonymous], EV BAS PREH PROT
[6]  
[Anonymous], NAT EMS RES AG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NAT EM MED SERV ED S
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[9]   Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations -: I:: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group -: art. no. 38 [J].
Atkins, D ;
Eccles, M ;
Flottorp, S ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Henry, D ;
Hill, S ;
Liberati, A ;
O'Connell, D ;
Oxman, AD ;
Phillips, B ;
Schünemann, H ;
Edejer, TTT ;
Vist, GE ;
Williams, JW .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (1)
[10]   AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kho, Michelle E. ;
Browman, George P. ;
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Cluzeau, Francoise ;
Feder, Gene ;
Fervers, Beatrice ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Makarski, Julie ;
Zitzelsberger, Louise .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) :E839-E842