Navigated femoral anteversion measurements:: A new intraoperative technique

被引:24
作者
Citak, Musa [1 ]
Gardner, Michael J. [2 ]
Citak, Mustafa [1 ]
Krettek, Christian [1 ]
Huefner, Tobias [1 ]
Kendoff, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Trauma Dept, D-30655 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2008年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
anteversion; navigation; CAS; fluoroscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2007.09.024
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of using the femoral neck axis and the greater trochanter with navigation to determine femoral anteversion.. Methods: Eight human femora with midshaft fractures were used. Real anteversion (AV) values were first measured on a movable fixation system, with digital images imported to software. Second, a navigation system determined the femoral AV with fluoroscopic images of hip, fracture site and femoral condyles. AV I: the centre of the femoral head to the femoral neck axis, the lateral distal femoral condyles and the distal fragment were marked. AV II: the centre of femoral head to the centre of the greater trochanter was marked by the same method. Results: Actual femoral AV ranged from 1.0 degrees to 9.0 degrees. Head-neck landmarks revealed a mean difference of 1.4 degrees. The greater trochanter-femoral head landmarks revealed a mean difference of 0.3 degrees, significantly less than the head-neck measurements. Conclusions: Compared with the reliable methods of determining femoral rotation postoperatively, intraoperative measurement is difficult. We found that the centre of the tip of the greater trochanter is easier to identify than the centre of the femoral neck and gives more precise results. This requires analysis of the contralateral limb, which may be feasible with newer non-invasive registration methods. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 471
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Precision, standarized Iso-C-arm based navigated boring on the proximal femur [J].
Arand, M ;
Schempf, M ;
Kinzl, L ;
Fleiter, T ;
Pless, D ;
Gebhard, F .
UNFALLCHIRURG, 2001, 104 (12) :1150-1156
[2]   FEMORAL-SHAFT FRACTURES TREATED BY INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY FOCUSING ON PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE METHOD [J].
BRATEN, M ;
TERJESEN, T ;
ROSSVOLL, I .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (06) :379-383
[3]  
CITAK M, 2006, NAVIGATED DETERMINAT
[4]   Femoral torsional deformities [J].
Cordier, W ;
Katthagen, BD .
ORTHOPADE, 2000, 29 (09) :795-801
[5]   Computer-assisted surgery [J].
Gebhard, F ;
Kinzl, L ;
Arand, M .
UNFALLCHIRURG, 2000, 103 (08) :612-617
[6]  
Grützner P, 1999, CHIRURG, V70, P276, DOI 10.1007/s001040050643
[7]   The effects of femora shaft malrotation on lower extremity anatomy [J].
Gugenheim, JJ ;
Probe, RA ;
Brinker, MR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2004, 18 (10) :658-664
[8]  
HERZBERG W, 1991, UNFALLCHIRURG, V94, P168
[9]  
Hilgert RE, 2006, UNFALLCHIRURG, V109, P855, DOI 10.1007/s00113-006-1093-6
[10]  
Hofstetter R, 1999, Comput Aided Surg, V4, P65, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1999)4:2<65::AID-IGS1>3.0.CO