Developing social entrepreneurship through public procurement: a wicked problem!

被引:3
作者
Aitken, Alan [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Dept Business Management, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH | 2022年
关键词
Social enterprise; Policy; Business development; 3RD SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; VALUE CREATION; ENTERPRISE; SERVICES; HEALTH; UK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1108/IJEBR-02-2022-0175
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper explores attempts to deliver socioeconomic benefit by developing social enterprise within the public sector supply chain. Design/methodology/approach A case study approach is adopted which focusses on the implementation of public procurement policy intended to support social entrepreneurs (SEs) in the delivery of social care in Scotland. Socio-technical systems theory (STST) is adopted as a lens through which to explore the case. Findings While acknowledging the contextual limits of the case study, the empirical findings recognise partial implementation of the measures intended to develop social entrepreneurship in the supply chain. The results, however, suggest that both the engagement levels of SEs and the expected socio economic benefits are yet to accrue fully. Social implications The paper concludes that in order to achieve the expected social benefits further progress is required in engaging SEs in formal collaborations with larger, potentially for profit, organisations and also in their increased involvement in the design and commissioning of public services. Originality/value The innovative, cross-sectional research design uses a survey based, gap analysis to provide a nuanced comparison between the views of local authority procurement officers and the opinions prevalent within social enterprise care providers and thereby to assesses the effectiveness of public policy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: looking inside the box and moving out of it [J].
Adro, Francisco do ;
Fernandes, Cristina .
INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 35 (04) :704-730
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PROCEEDING 33 ANN AR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Report
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ENT 3 SECT ACT PLAN, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2051-5545.2008.TB00178.X
[5]   Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI) [J].
Arvidson, Malin ;
Lyon, Fergus ;
McKay, Stephen ;
Moro, Domenico .
VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW, 2013, 4 (01) :3-18
[6]   Does sector matter for the quality of care services? A secondary analysis of social care services regulated by the Care Inspectorate in Scotland [J].
Bach-Mortensen, Anders Malthe ;
Montgomery, Paul .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02)
[7]   To bid or not to bid: That is the question: Public procurement, project complexity and corruption [J].
Baldi, Simona ;
Bottasso, Anna ;
Conti, Maurizio ;
Piccardo, Chiara .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 43 :89-106
[8]  
Bostrom R.P., 1977, MIS Q, V1, P11, DOI [10.2307/248710, DOI 10.2307/248710]
[9]   A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems [J].
Bostrom, Robert P. ;
Gupta, Saurabh ;
Thomas, Dominic .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 26 (01) :17-47
[10]   Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study [J].
Brammer, Stephen ;
Walker, Helen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (04) :452-476