Comparison between two different methodologies to design neural classifiers

被引:0
|
作者
Prieto, R [1 ]
Rosendo, JA [1 ]
Herrera, AA [1 ]
Padrón, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Ciencias Aplicadas & Desarrollo Tecnol, Lab Comp Adaptable, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
来源
7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XIV, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS | 2003年
关键词
artificial neural networks; neural classifiers; back-propagation training; evolutionary algorithms; genetic algorithms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this work we present the design of a neural classifier to be used in an automatic system aimed to recognize and count cells in different stages of development. The purpose of the neural classifier subsystem is to determine the kind of cell a pattern obtained from the digital image processing units belongs. However, the different cells presented in a preparation are not easy to discriminate, even to a human expert, due to the fact that the cell features that can be processed are not totally discriminatory. In this way, the neural classifier must provide a reliable classification of a set of overlapping patterns. In order to build a neural classifier, its structural and performance features must be adapted to the problem characteristics. Nevertheless, to find the best structure that produces the best classifier is a problem in itself that involves several factors. We had faced this problem comparing two different methodologies: one using classical neural network techniques to select the proper architecture and training process; the other using multi-evolutionary techniques to search optimal configuration of the classifier.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 395
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of two different quadratic pattern classifiers using the same test data
    Schürmann, J.
    Krause, P.
    IT - Information Technology, 1974, 16 (1-6): : 132 - 142
  • [22] Comparison Of Different Classifiers for Emotion Recognition
    Iliou, Theodoros
    Anagnostopoulos, Christos-Nikolaos
    13TH PANHELLENIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 102 - 106
  • [23] Evolutionary Design of Multilayer and Radial Basis Function Neural Network Classifiers: an Empirical Comparison
    Mohamed, Njah
    Ridha, El Hamdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2016, 16 (06): : 86 - 93
  • [24] Comparison of two different methodologies for the detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in plasma
    Radhakrishnan, S
    Raghuraman, S
    Abraham, P
    Sridharan, G
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1999, 35 (03) : 215 - 218
  • [25] Comparison of neural classifiers for vehicles gear estimation
    Wefky, A.
    Espinosa, F.
    Prieto, A.
    Garcia, J. J.
    Barrios, C.
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (04) : 3580 - 3599
  • [26] Design of Convolutional Fuzzy Neural Network Classifiers
    Men, Jiying
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Jinsong
    2020 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ICAICE 2020), 2020, : 306 - 309
  • [27] A Comparison Between two Different Techniques for Beam-scanning Reflectarray Antennas Design
    Niccolai, Alessandro
    Zich, Riccardo
    Beccaria, Michele
    Massaccesi, Andrea
    Pirinoli, Paola
    2021 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2021,
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF NEURAL-NET CLASSIFIERS AND LINEAR TREE CLASSIFIERS - THEIR SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
    PARK, YT
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1994, 27 (11) : 1493 - 1503
  • [29] Comparison of two simulation methodologies in construction
    Gonzalez-Quevedo, Antonio
    AbouRizk, Simaan M.
    Iseley, David T.
    Halpin, Daniel W.
    Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1993, 119 (03) : 573 - 589
  • [30] COMPARISON OF TWO METHODOLOGIES OF OOCYTE ENUCLEATION
    Grau, N.
    Escrich, L.
    Albert, C.
    Delgado, A.
    De los Santos, M. J.
    Escriba, M. J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S246 - S246