The treatment strategy and outcome for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience in 239 patients

Purpose There exist no treatment guidelines for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (srHCC) and its prognosis remains controversial. Methods Patients were retrospectively enrolled and grouped based on hemodynamics and tumor resectability. The 30-day mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), peritoneal metastasis (PM) and intrahepatic metastasis (IM) rates were compared. Results In general, 239 patients were classified into four groups: patients with stable hemodynamics underwent semi-elective hepatectomy (n = 119), and those with unstable hemodynamics received emergent hepatectomy (n = 17), sequential hemostatic-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)/-laparotomy with late hepatectomy (n = 49), or TACE only (n = 54). Hepatectomy was safer and provided better OS and PFS than TACE both before and after propensity score matching. Emergent hepatectomy was associated with higher 30-day mortality (6.2%, P < 0.05) and poorer prognosis whereas semi-elective hepatectomy and sequential treatment had comparable mortality (both 0%) and survival (36.3% vs 45.2%, P > 0.05). Compared with hemostatic TACE in the sequential treatment group, early surgical intervention (semi-elective hepatectomy, emergent hepatectomy, and sequential laparotomy with late hepatectomy) decreased PM (13.6% vs 34.2%, P = 0.003) whereas had higher IM (68.0% vs 50.0%, P = 0.039), but neither procedure had affected OS. In srHCC patients with high risk of recurrence (multiple tumors, micro- and macro-vascular invasion), postoperative adjuvant TACE improved OS. Conclusion Hepatectomy could provide better prognosis than TACE for srHCC patients while semi-elective hepatectomy and sequential hemostatic-TACE with staged hepatectomy are viable options for srHCCs with stable and unstable hemodynamics, respectively.