Population-Based Study to Determine the Health System Costs of Using the 21-Gene Assay

被引:18
作者
Mittmann, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Earle, Craig C. [3 ,4 ]
Cheng, Stephanie Y. [4 ]
Julian, Jim A. [6 ,7 ]
Rahman, Farah [4 ]
Seung, Soo Jin [5 ]
Levine, Mark N. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Canc Care Ontario, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Ontario Inst Canc Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon HOPE Res Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Ontario Clin Oncol Grp, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
RECURRENCE SCORE ASSAY; POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; IMPACT; WOMEN; DECISIONS; ESTROGEN; THERAPY; SOCIETY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2017.74.2577
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The 21-gene assay Oncotype Dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA) test is used to aid the decision about chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received endocrine therapy. Economic studies to support test adoption used decision-analytic models with assumptions and data derived from disparate sources. The objective was to evaluate whether the 21-gene assay test resulted in an overall cost expense or saving to the health system. Patients and Methods One thousand participants enrolled in a field evaluation study, were linked to population-level health system administrative databases, and were observed for 20 months. The cost for the cohort, which included the cost of the test, subsequent treatments received, and health care encounters, was determined. The cost in the absence of the test was compared with the pretest recommendation about chemotherapy from the field study for a base case and under scenarios that reflected different adjuvant chemotherapy use. Overall health system costs and incremental costs were calculated. Results The 21-gene assay resulted in a net decrease in chemotherapy use of 23%. For the base case incremental analysis, the actual overall health system cost of this cohort, including the cost of 21-gene assay, was $29.2 million compared with $26.2 million in the absence of the test-an increase of $3.1 million. For three of the four scenario analyses, the actual overall cost to the health system exceeded the estimated cost in the absence of the test. Results showed that, when at least half of the population received adjuvant chemotherapy, the cost increased to $30.2 million. Conclusion The use of real-world administrative data showed that, despite lower rates of chemotherapy use, the 21-gene assay test results in an overall incremental cost to the health care system in the short-term under most assumptions. (c) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:238 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] The effects of oncotype DX recurrence scores on chemotherapy utilization in a multi-institutional breast cancer cohort
    Ademuyiwa, Foluso O.
    Miller, Austin
    O'Connor, Tracey
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Thorat, Mangesh A.
    Sledge, George W.
    Levine, Ellis
    Badve, Sunil
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 126 (03) : 797 - 802
  • [2] Cancer Care Ontario, 2016, ONT CANC STAT 2016
  • [3] The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carlson, Josh J.
    Roth, Joshua A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 141 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [4] A prospective clinical utility and pharmacoeconomic study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score® assay in oestrogen receptor positive node negative breast cancer
    Davidson, J. A.
    Cromwell, I.
    Ellard, S. L.
    Lohrisch, C.
    Gelmon, K. A.
    Shenkier, T.
    Villa, D.
    Lim, H.
    Sun, S.
    Taylor, S.
    Taylor, M.
    Czerkawski, B.
    Hayes, M.
    Ionescu, D. N.
    Yoshizawa, C.
    Chao, C.
    Peacock, S.
    Chia, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (11) : 2469 - 2475
  • [5] Cost Effectiveness of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Versus Canadian Clinical Practice in Post-Menopausal Women with Early-Stage Estrogen or Progesterone-Receptor-Positive, Axillary Lymph-Node Positive Breast Cancer
    Hannouf, Malek B.
    Xie, Bin
    Brackstone, Muriel
    Zaric, Gregory S.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (02) : 135 - 147
  • [6] A New Look at Node-Negative Breast Cancer
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Thomssen, Christoph
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 : 51 - 60
  • [7] Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
    Harris, Lyndsay N.
    Ismaila, Nofisat
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Andre, Fabrice
    Collyar, Deborah E.
    Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana M.
    Hammond, Elizabeth H.
    Kuderer, Nicole M.
    Liu, Minetta C.
    Mennel, Robert G.
    Van Poznak, Catherine
    Bast, Robert C.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) : 1134 - +
  • [8] Helwick Caroline, 2015, Am Health Drug Benefits, V8, P10
  • [9] A decision impact, decision conflict and economic assessment of routine Oncotype DX testing of 146 women with node-negative or pNImi, ER-positive breast cancer in the UK
    Holt, S.
    Bertelli, G.
    Humphreys, I.
    Valentine, W.
    Durrani, S.
    Pudney, D.
    Rolles, M.
    Moe, M.
    Khawaja, S.
    Sharaiha, Y.
    Brinkworth, E.
    Whelan, S.
    Jones, S.
    Bennett, H.
    Phillips, C. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (11) : 2250 - 2258
  • [10] The Effect of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score on Treatment Recommendations for Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Stage Breast Cancer and Correlation with Estimation of Recurrence Risk by Breast Cancer Specialists
    Joh, Jennifer E.
    Esposito, Nicole N.
    Kiluk, John V.
    Laronga, Christine
    Lee, M. Catherine
    Loftus, Loretta
    Soliman, Hatem
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Reynolds, Carol
    Lawton, Thomas J.
    Acs, Peter I.
    Gordan, Lucio
    Acs, Geza
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (11) : 1520 - 1526