The effect of antacid on salivary pH in patients with and without dental erosion after multiple acid challenges

被引:0
作者
Dhuhair, Sarah [1 ]
Dennison, Joseph B. [2 ]
Yaman, Peter [2 ]
Neiva, Gisele F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Grad Restorat Dent Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Cariol Restorat Sci & Endodont, Grad Restorat Dent Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Gen Dent Clin, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
TOOTH WEAR; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; ADOLESCENTS; MODELS; SYSTEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of antacid swish in the salivary pH values and to monitor the pH changes in subjects with and without dental erosion after multiple acid challenge tests. Methods: 20 subjects with tooth erosion were matched in age and gender with 20 healthy controls according to specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Baseline measures were taken of salivary pH, buffering capacity and salivary flow rate using the Saliva Check System. Subjects swished with Diet Pepsi three times at 10-minute intervals. Changes in pH were monitored using a digital pH meter at 0-, 5-, and 10-minute intervals and at every 5 minutes after the third swish until pH resumed baseline value or 45 minutes relapse. Swishing regimen was repeated on a second visit, followed by swishing with sugar-free liquid antacid (Mylanta Supreme). Recovery times were also recorded. Data was analyzed using independent t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and Fisher's exact test (alpha=0.05). Results: Baseline buffering capacity and flow rate were not significantly different between groups (P=0.542; P=0.2831, respectively). Baseline salivary pH values were similar between groups (P=0.721). No significant differences in salivary pH values were found between erosion and non-erosion groups in response to multiple acid challenges (P=0.695) or antacid neutralization (P=0.861). Analysis of salivary pH recovery time revealed no significant differences between groups after acid challenges (P=0.091) or after the use of antacid (P=0.118). There was a highly significant difference in the survival curves of the two groups on Day 2, with the non-erosion group resolving significantly faster than the erosion group (P=0.0086).
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 104
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Al-Omiri MK, 2006, INT J PROSTHODONT, V19, P601
  • [2] Attin T, 2006, MG ORAL SCI, V20, P152, DOI 10.1159/000093361
  • [3] Azzopardi A, 2000, Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, V8, P93
  • [4] Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs
    Bartlett, D.
    Ganss, C.
    Lussi, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2008, 12 (Suppl 1) : S65 - S68
  • [5] Bartlett D, 1999, INT J PROSTHODONT, V12, P401
  • [6] Bartlett D, 2006, MG ORAL SCI, V20, P119, DOI 10.1159/000093359
  • [7] A New Index of Tooth Wear Reproducibility and Application to a Sample of 18- to 30-Year-Old University Students
    Fares, J.
    Shirodaria, S.
    Chiu, K.
    Ahmad, N.
    Sherriff, M.
    Bartlett, D.
    [J]. CARIES RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [8] Extra-esophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux
    Farrokhi, F.
    Vaezi, M. F.
    [J]. ORAL DISEASES, 2007, 13 (04) : 349 - 359
  • [9] Dental erosion in children and adolescents - a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation using study models
    Ganss, C
    Klimek, J
    Giese, K
    [J]. COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 29 (04) : 264 - 271
  • [10] Gastric Reflux is a Significant Causative Factor of Tooth Erosion
    Holbrook, W. P.
    Furuholm, J.
    Gudmundsson, K.
    Theodors, A.
    Meurman, J. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 88 (05) : 422 - 426