Low-income employees' choices regarding employment benefits aimed at improving the socioeconomic determinants of health

被引:13
作者
Danis, Marion [1 ]
Lovett, Francis [1 ]
Sabik, Lindsay [1 ]
Aclikes, Katherin [1 ]
Cheng, Glen [2 ]
Aomo, Tom
机构
[1] NIH, Ctr Clin, Dept Clin Bioeth, Bethesda, MD 20982 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Clin Bioeth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2006.091033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. Socioeconomic factors are associated with reduced health status in low-income populations. We sought to identify affordable employment benefit packages that might ameliorate these socioeconomic factors and would be consonant with employees' priorities. Methods. Working in groups (n=53), low-income employees (n=408; 62% women, 65% Black) from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Md, metropolitan area, participated in a computerized exercise in which they expressed their preference for employment benefit packages intended to address socioeconomic determinants of health. The hypothetical costs of these benefits reflected those of the average US benefit package available to low-income employees. Questionnaires ascertained sociodemographic information and attitudes. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to examine benefit choices. Results. Groups chose offered benefits in the following descending rank order: health care, retirement, vacation, disability pay, training, job flexibility, family time, dependent care, monetary advice, anxiety assistance, wellness, housing assistance, and nutrition programs. Participants varied in their personal choices, but 78% expressed willingness to abide by their groups' choices. Conclusions. It is possible to design employment benefits that ameliorate socioeconomic determinants of health and are acceptable to low-income employees. These benefit packages can be provided at the cost of benefit packages currently available to some low-income employees.
引用
收藏
页码:1650 / 1657
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Acheson D., 1998, Independent inquiry into inequalities in health: report
  • [2] AGREN G, SWEDENS NEW PUBLIC H
  • [3] [Anonymous], STAT COUNT QUICKF
  • [4] SUPPORTING THE ELDERLY - WORKPLACE PROGRAMS FOR EMPLOYED CAREGIVERS
    BARR, JK
    JOHNSON, KW
    WARSHAW, LJ
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1992, 70 (03) : 509 - 533
  • [5] *CAN POP HLTH IN C, 2004, IMPR HLTH CAN
  • [6] Chapman LS, 2004, AM J HEALTH PROMOT, V18, P6
  • [7] Chen M S Jr, 1988, Health Values, V12, P16
  • [8] Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured
    Danis, M
    Biddle, AK
    Goold, SD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [9] DANIS M, 2005, FORUM FAMILY CONSUME
  • [10] Choosing healthplans all together: A deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources
    Goold, SD
    Biddle, AK
    Klipp, G
    Hall, CN
    Danis, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2005, 30 (04) : 563 - 601