Favorable Outcome with Close Margins in Patients Undergoing Nipple/Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: 5-year Follow-up

被引:8
作者
Ozkurt, Enver [1 ]
Tukenmez, Mustafa [1 ]
Guven, Erdem [2 ]
Ozden, Burcu Celet [2 ]
Oner, Gizem [1 ]
Muslumanoglu, Mahmut [1 ]
Igci, Abdullah [1 ]
Ozmen, Vahit [1 ]
Kucucuk, Seden [3 ]
Cabioglu, Neslihan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Breast Unit, Istanbul Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Istanbul Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Istanbul Inst Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Breast implants; mastectomy; subcutaneous; breast reconstruction; surgical margin; local recurrence; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; RECURRENCE RATES; AREOLA COMPLEX; CANCER; SKIN; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy has recently been reported to be the preferred type of surgery among breast-specific surgeons and plastic surgeons. Aims: To explore the significant clinicopathological factors associated with long-term outcome related to local recurrences of the nipple among patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant after mastectomy. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Methods: From January 2007 to January 2013, 51 breast cancer patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander or implant were retrospectively analysed. Patients' demographic data, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical outcome by disease-free survival and disease-specific survival analyses were determined. Results: The median follow-up was 64 (31-114) months. Of the 57 mastectomies, 41 were skin sparing mastectomy (72%) and 16 were nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (28%). Immediate breast reconstruction surgery included tissue expander (n=46, 81%) or implant (n=11, 19%) placement. The molecular subgroups of 47 invasive cancers were as follows: luminal A (n=23, 49%), luminal B (n=16, 34%), non-luminal HER2 (n=5, 10.6), triple negative breast cancer (n=3, 6.4%). The 5-years disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 96.8%, 90%, and 97.6% respectively. Patients with luminal A cancer were found to have an improved 5-year disease-free survival time than other (luminal A; 100% vs. non-luminal A; 78%; p=0.028). Of the 14 nipple-areola sparing mastectomy, 13 had a close median tumour distance to nipple-areola complex (<20 mm) with a 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival of 100%. Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction with implant or tissue expander can be safely applied in patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy or nipple-areola sparing mastectomy. Patients with luminal-A type show the most favourable outcome. During the 5-year follow-up period, patients even with close margins (<20 mm) to nipple-areola complex with nipple-areola sparing mastectomy have excellent locoregional and overall survival when treated by contemporary multidisciplinary oncological management.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 92
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[11]   The Oncological Safety of Skin Sparing Mastectomy with Conservation of the Nipple-Areola Complex and Autologous Reconstruction: An Extended Follow-Up Study [J].
Gerber, Bernd ;
Krause, Annette ;
Dieterich, Max ;
Kundt, Guenther ;
Reimer, Toralf .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (03) :461-468
[12]  
Horiguchi J, 2001, ANTICANCER RES, V21, P2963
[13]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in 99 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years [J].
Jensen, J. Arthur ;
Orringer, Jay S. ;
Giuliano, Armando E. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (06) :1665-1670
[14]   Comparison of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Non-Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies [J].
Lanitis, Sophocles ;
Tekkis, Paris P. ;
Sgourakis, George ;
Dimopoulos, Nikitas ;
Al Mufti, Ragheed ;
Hadjiminas, Dimitri J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (04) :632-639
[15]   Identification of a Low-Risk Luminal A Breast Cancer Cohort That May Not Benefit From Breast Radiotherapy [J].
Liu, Fei-Fei ;
Shi, Wei ;
Done, Susan J. ;
Miller, Naomi ;
Pintilie, Melania ;
Voduc, David ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Nofech-Mozes, Sharon ;
Chang, Martin C. ;
Whelan, Timothy J. ;
Weir, Lorna M. ;
Olivotto, Ivo A. ;
McCready, David R. ;
Fyles, Anthony W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (18) :2035-U73
[16]   Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review by receptor phenotype [J].
Lowery, Aoife J. ;
Kell, Malcolm R. ;
Glynn, Ronan W. ;
Kerin, Michael J. ;
Sweeney, Karl J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 133 (03) :831-841
[17]   The Role of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature [J].
Mallon, Peter ;
Feron, Jean-Guillaume ;
Couturaud, Benoit ;
Fitoussi, Alfred ;
Lemasurier, Perig ;
Guihard, Thierry ;
Cothier-Savay, Isabelle ;
Reyal, Fabien .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (05) :969-984
[18]   Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Technical Aspects and Aesthetic Outcomes [J].
Moyer, Hunter R. ;
Ghazi, Bahair ;
Daniel, Jarrod R. ;
Gasgarth, Renee ;
Carlson, Grant W. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (05) :446-450
[19]   Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy [J].
Patani, Neill ;
Mokbel, Kefah .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 111 (03) :391-403
[20]   Expanding the Indications for Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Is It Safe for Patients with Locally Advanced Disease? [J].
Peled, Anne Warren ;
Wang, Frederick ;
Foster, Robert D. ;
Alvarado, Michael ;
Ewing, Cheryl A. ;
Sbitany, Hani ;
Esserman, Laura J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) :87-91