Spinal cord stimulation and failed back surgery syndrome. Clinical results with laminectomy electrodes

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia March, Guillermo [1 ]
Bordes, Vicente [1 ]
Roldan, Pedro [1 ]
Real, Luis [1 ]
Gonzalez Darder, Jose Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Univ, Serv Neurocirugia, Valencia, Spain
来源
NEUROCIRUGIA | 2015年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
Failed back surgery syndrome; Spinal cord stimulation; Spinal anaesthesia; Laminectomy electrode; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHRONIC PAIN; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; PLACEMENT; OUTCOMES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucir.2014.09.009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation is a widely-accepted technique in the treatment of back pain resulting from failed back surgery. Classically, stimulation has been carried out with percutaneous electrodes implanted under local anaesthesia and sedation. However, the ease of migration and the difficulty of reproducing electrical paresthesias in large areas with such electrodes has led to increasing use of surgical plate leads, which have the disadvantage of the need for general anaesthesia and a laminectomy for implantation. Objectives: Our objective was to report the clinical results, technical details, advantages and benefits of laminectomy lead placement under epidural anaesthesia in failed back surgery syndrome cases. Material and methods: Spinal cord stimulation was performed in a total of 119 patients (52 men and 67 women), aged between 31 and 73 years (average, 47.3). Epidural anaesthesia was induced with ropivacaine. In all cases we inserted the octapolar or 16-polar lead in the epidural space through a small laminectomy. The final position of the leads was the vertebral level that provided coverage of the patient's pain. The electrodes were connected at dual-channel or rechargeable pulse generators. Results: After a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, the results in terms of improvement of the previous painful situation was satisfactory, with an analgesia level of 58% of axial pain and 60% of radicular pain in more than 70% of cases. None of the patients said that the surgery stage was painful or unpleasant. No serious complications were included in the group, but in 6 cases the system had to be explanted because of ineffectiveness or intolerance of longterm neurostimulation. Conclusions: This study, with a significant number of patients, used epidural anaesthesia for spinal cord stimulation of lead implants by laminectomy in failed back surgery syndromes. The technique seems to be safe and effective. (C) 2014 Sociedad Espafiola de Neurocirugfa. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Peterson, Erika
    Provenzano, David A.
    Staats, Peter
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (14) : S61 - S66
  • [2] Patients' Expectations on Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Qualitative Exploration
    Henssen, Dylan J. H. A.
    Scheepers, Nicole
    Kurt, Erkan
    Arnts, Inge
    Steegers, Monique
    Vissers, Kris
    van Dongen, Robert
    Engels, Yvonne
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (04) : 452 - 462
  • [3] Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Study
    Harman, Ferhat
    Aydin, Seckin
    Sencan, Savas
    Akdeniz, Esra
    Guvenc, Yahya
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Eyigor, Can
    Uyar, Meltem
    Gunduz, Osman Hakan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 30 (05) : 739 - 745
  • [4] Increasing Rates of Imaging in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients: Implications for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Han, Jing L.
    Petraglia, Frank W., III
    Gramer, Robert
    Yang, Siyun
    Pagadala, Promila
    Parente, Beth
    Xie, Jichun
    Petrella, Jeffrey R.
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2017, 20 (06) : E968 - E976
  • [5] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: to Trial or Not to Trial?
    Witkam, Richard L.
    Kragt, Elisabeth A. M.
    Arnts, Inge J. J.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    van Dongen, Robert
    Kurt, Erkan
    Steegers, Monique A. H.
    van Haren, Frank G. A. M.
    Maandag, Natasja J. G.
    Gort, Cees
    Henssen, Dylan J. H. A.
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 24 (07) : 1298 - 1306
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome
    Leveque, JC
    Villavicencio, AT
    Bulsara, KR
    Rubin, L
    Gorecki, JP
    NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (01): : 1 - 9
  • [7] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
    Leavitt M.
    Leong M.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2017, 5 (4) : 175 - 179
  • [8] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Frey, Michael E.
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Schultz, David M.
    Smith, Howard S.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2009, 12 (02) : 379 - 397
  • [9] Utilization of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Babu, Ranjith
    Bagley, Jacob H.
    Choi, Jonathan
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Huh, Billy K.
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Patil, Chirag G.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (12) : E719 - E727
  • [10] Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome
    Taras Masnyk
    Frederick D. Brown
    Current Review of Pain, 1998, 2 (2): : 77 - 84