The role of body weight in oral contraceptive failure: Results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth

被引:36
作者
Brunner, LR [1 ]
Hogue, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
contraceptives; oral; obesity; women's health;
D O I
10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.10.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Many unintended pregnancies occur in women who use contraception. We conducted this study to determine if increasing body weight is associated with oral contraceptive (OC) failure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study consists of the 1916 women who reported using OCs in January 1993 and provided complete covariate information on the 1993 National Health Interview Survey and 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) were self-reported in 1993. The outcome was defined to be any conception occurring in women reporting OC use during the month of conception. Cox proportional hazards models were used to model the body weight/BMI-OC failure association. RESULTS: Women with a BMI >= 30 had a statistically significant increased risk of having an OC failure as compared to women with BMIs of 20 to 24.9 (HR = 1.80, 95% Cl, 1.01, 3.20). However, after adjustment for age, marital status, education, poverty, race/ethnicity, parity, and dual method use, this increased risk was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (HR = 1.51, 95% Cl, 0.81, 2.82). Increasing body weight was not associated with an increased risk of OC failure in the unadjusted or adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a strong or statistically significant association between increasing body weight/BMI and OC failure among this population of women. Prospective studies specifically designed to examine this association are needed to determine if heavier women should be advised to use a contraceptive method other than OCs to prevent pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive - A randomized controlled trial
    Audet, MC
    Moreau, M
    Koltun, WD
    Waldbaum, AS
    Shangold, G
    Fisher, AC
    Creasy, GW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (18): : 2347 - 2354
  • [2] Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population
    Bolton-Smith, C
    Woodward, M
    Tunstall-Pedoe, H
    Morrison, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [3] Bolúmar F, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P1072, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010150
  • [4] THE ABILITY OF WOMEN TO RECALL THEIR ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE HISTORIES
    COULTER, A
    VESSEY, M
    MCPHERSON, K
    CROSSLEY, B
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 1986, 33 (02) : 127 - 137
  • [5] A 10-year follow-up study of contraceptive Norplant implants
    Du, MK
    Chow, LP
    Zheng, HM
    Chen, CHC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2000, 68 (03) : 249 - 256
  • [6] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF UNINTENDED PREGNANCY AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE
    FORREST, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (05) : 1485 - 1489
  • [7] Contraceptive failure rates: New estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth
    Fu, HS
    Darroch, JE
    Haas, T
    Ranjit, N
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 31 (02): : 56 - 63
  • [8] TRENDS IN THE CONTENT AND USE OF ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1964-88
    GERSTMAN, BB
    GROSS, TP
    KENNEDY, DL
    BENNETT, RC
    TOMITA, DK
    STADEL, BV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 81 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [9] GLASS R, 1974, BRIT J PREV SOC MED, V28, P273
  • [10] GRIMES DA, 1999, CONTRACEPTION REPORT, V10, P12