Driving Factors behind Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in the US Road Transport Sector: A Decomposition Analysis

被引:14
作者
Jiang, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Peng [2 ]
Wu, Chengke [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
carbon emissions; carbon neutrality; renewable energy; electric vehicles; CO2; EMISSIONS; DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CHINA; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19042321
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The U.S. is the second largest contributor to carbon emissions in the world, with its road transport sector being one of the most significant emission sources. However, few studies have been conducted on factors influencing the emissions changes for the U.S. from the perspective of passenger and freight transport. This study aimed to evaluate the carbon emissions from the U.S. road passenger and freight transport sectors, using a Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index approach. Emissions from 2008 to 2017 in the U.S. road transport sector were analysed and key findings include: (1) energy intensity and passenger transport intensity are critical for reducing emissions from road passenger transport, and transport structure change is causing a shift in emissions between different passenger transport modes; and (2) the most effective strategies to reduce carbon emissions in the road freight transport sector are to improve energy intensity and reduce freight transport intensity. Several policy recommendations regarding reducing energy and transport intensity are proposed. The results and policy recommendations are expected to provide useful references for policy makers to form carbon emissions reduction strategies for the road transport sector.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide
    Ang, BW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) : 867 - 871
  • [2] Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?
    Ang, BW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) : 1131 - 1139
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Electric Vehicle Outlook 2021 BNEF
  • [4] Bureau of Economic Analysis`, MOT VEH UN RET SAL T
  • [5] CC, 2017, TRANSP EM DRIV CAR P
  • [6] Central Intelligence Agency, World Factbook
  • [7] Statistics Notes: Percentage differences, symmetry, and natural logarithms
    Cole, Tim J.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
  • [8] Ex-post decomposition analysis of passenger car energy demand and associated CO2 emissions
    Dennehy, Emer R.
    Gallachoir, Brian P. O.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 59 : 400 - 416
  • [9] Department of Numbers, US HOUS INC
  • [10] DieselNet EU, CARS GREENH GAS EM