Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors

被引:159
作者
Prastawa, M
Bullitt, E
Moon, N
Van Leemput, K
Gerig, G
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
brain tumor segmentation; expectation; -maximization; level-set evolution; spatial atlas;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00506-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. Manual segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance images is a challenging and time-consuming task. An automated system has been developed for brain tumor segmentation that will provide objective, reproducible segmentations that are close to the manual results. Additionally, the method segments white matter, grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and edema. The segmentation of pathology and healthy structures is crucial for surgical planning and intervention. Materials and Methods. The method performs the segmentation of a registered set of magnetic resonance images using an expectation-maximization scheme. The segmentation is guided by a spatial probabilistic atlas that contains expert prior knowledge about brain structures. This atlas is modified with the subject-specific brain tumor prior that is computed based on contrast enhancement. Results. Five cases with different types of tumors are selected for evaluation. The results obtained from the automatic segmentation program are compared with results from manual and semi-automated methods. The automated method yields results that have surface distances at roughly 1-4 mm compared with the manual results. Conclusion. The automated method can be applied to different types of tumors. Although its performance is below that of the semi-automated method, it has the advantage of requiring no user supervision.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1348
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images
    Bullitt, E
    Gerig, G
    Pizer, SM
    Lin, WL
    Aylward, SR
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (09) : 1163 - 1171
  • [2] BULLITT E, 2003, IN PRESS SPRINGER LE
  • [3] EVANS AC, 1993, NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM & MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, P1813, DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373602
  • [4] GERIG G, 1991, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V511, P175, DOI 10.1007/BFb0033752
  • [5] Gerig G., 2001, INT C MEDICAL IMAGE, VVol. 2208, P516, DOI [10.1007/3-540-45468-3_62, DOI 10.1007/3-540-45468-3_62]
  • [6] Tumour volume determination from MR images by morphological segmentation
    Gibbs, P
    Buckley, DL
    Blackband, SJ
    Horsman, A
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (11) : 2437 - 2446
  • [7] Ho S, 2002, INT C PATT RECOG, P532, DOI 10.1109/ICPR.2002.1044788
  • [8] TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION WITH T1, T2, AND PROTON DENSITY VALUES - RESULTS IN 160 PATIENTS WITH BRAIN-TUMORS
    JUST, M
    THELEN, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (03) : 779 - 785
  • [9] MODEL-BASED 3-D SEGMENTATION OF MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS LESIONS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGES
    KAMBER, M
    SHINGHAL, R
    COLLINS, DL
    FRANCIS, GS
    EVANS, AC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1995, 14 (03) : 442 - 453
  • [10] KJAER L, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P127