Operational biomass recovery of small trees: equations for six central Ontario tree species

被引:3
作者
Thiel, Matt [1 ]
Basiliko, Nathan [2 ,3 ]
Caspersen, John [4 ]
Fera, Jeff [5 ]
Jones, Trevor [6 ]
机构
[1] FPInnovations, Pointe Claire, PQ H9R 3J9, Canada
[2] Laurentian Univ, Vale Living Lakes Ctr, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
[3] Laurentian Univ, Dept Biol, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Forestry, Toronto, ON M5S 3B3, Canada
[5] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Wood Fibre Ctr, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2E5, Canada
[6] Ontario Minist Nat Resources & Forestry, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 2E5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
biomass; shelterwood silviculture; umerchantable trees; logging residues; mixedwood; NORTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; RENEWABLE ENERGY-SOURCES; ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; FOREST BIOMASS; WOOD; ARCHITECTURE; ESTIMATORS; CHALLENGES; DENSITY; CANADA;
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-2014-0429
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Accurate estimates of the amount of biomass that can be recovered at the roadside are needed to make informed decisions about whether to implement an increased utilization harvesting system to supply additional bioenergy feedstocks. Current estimates of recovery are based on total aboveground biomass equations that do not always account for the volume lost to the unharvested stumps or to tops and branches broken during forestry operations. The study took place in a white pine (Pinus strobus L.) mixedwood forest at the Petawawa Research Forest in central Ontario. Equations to describe recoverable biomass were developed from 371 cut and skidded trees, which ranged from 3 to 24 cmin diameter at breast height, across six species. For each species and diameter size class, we evaluated the difference between estimates produced by locally developed equations and those from published equations produced for other locations and forest types. Our recovered biomass estimates were generally higher than the Canadian national averages but within the observed range of published values from across North America. We report that small trees are recovered nearly in their entirety, with little breakage and loss during operations. The high degree of variability among estimates produced by the various equations poses one of the biggest challenges in accurately estimating roadside biomass in an operational setting.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 377
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Alam MB, 2012, CAN J FOREST RES, V42, P506, DOI [10.1139/X2012-011, 10.1139/x2012-011]
  • [2] The Role of Wood Mass Density and Mechanical Constraints in the Economy of Tree Architecture
    Anten, Niels P. R.
    Schieving, Feike
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2010, 175 (02) : 250 - 260
  • [3] Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species
    Chojnacky, David C.
    Heath, Linda S.
    Jenkins, Jennifer C.
    [J]. FORESTRY, 2014, 87 (01): : 129 - 151
  • [4] Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach
    de Vries, Bert J. M.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Hoogwijk, Monique M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (04) : 2590 - 2610
  • [5] Evergreenness and wood density predict height-diameter scaling in trees of the northeastern United States
    Ducey, Mark J.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 279 : 21 - 26
  • [6] Future quantities and spatial distribution of harvesting residue and dead wood from natural disturbances in Canada
    Dymond, C. C.
    Titus, B. D.
    Stinson, G.
    Kurz, W. A.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 260 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [7] On the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Sources
    Edenhofer, Ottmar
    Seyboth, Kristin
    Creutzig, Felix
    Schloemer, Steffen
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 : 169 - 200
  • [8] Fatemi FR, 2011, CAN J FOREST RES, V41, P881, DOI [10.1139/X10-248, 10.1139/x10-248]
  • [9] An evaluation of greenhouse gas mitigation options for coal-fired power plants in the US Great Lakes States
    Froese, Robert E.
    Shonnard, David R.
    Miller, Chris A.
    Koers, Ken P.
    Johnson, Dana M.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (03) : 251 - 262
  • [10] Jenkins JC, 2003, FOREST SCI, V49, P12