Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
van Dort, D. I. M. [1 ]
Peij, K. R. A. H. [1 ]
Manintveld, O. C. [2 ]
Hoeks, S. E. [3 ]
Morshuis, W. J. [1 ]
van Royen, N. [4 ]
Ten Cate, T. [4 ]
Geuzebroek, G. S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Impella; Haemodynamic monitoring; Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Left ventricular assist device; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; IMPELLA; 5.0; DEVICE; EXPERIENCE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; BRIDGE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device is designed to augment cardiac output and reduce left ventricular wall stress and aims to improve survival in cases of cardiogenic shock. In this meta-analysis we investigated the haemodynamic effects of the Impella device in a clinical setting. We systematically searched all articles in PubMed/Medline and Embase up to July 2019. The primary outcomes were cardiac power (CP) and cardiac power index (CPI). Survival rates and other haemodynamic data were included as secondary outcomes. For the critical appraisal, we used a modified version of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services quality assessment form. The systematic review included 12 studies with a total of 596 patients. In 258 patients the CP and/or CPI could be extracted. Our meta-analysis showed an increase of 0.39 W [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24, 0.54], (p = 0.01) and 0.22 W/m(2) (95% CI: 0.18, 0.26), (p < 0.01) for the CP and CPI, respectively. The overall survival rate was 56% (95% CI: 0.50, 0.62), (p = 0.09). The quality of the studies was moderate, mostly due to the presence of confounders. Our study suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock, Impella support seems effective in augmenting CP(I). This study merely investigates the haemodynamic effectiveness of the Impella device and does not reflect the complete clinical impact for the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 189
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry
    Annamalai, Shiva K.
    Esposito, Michele L.
    Jorde, Lena
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Hall, Shelley A.
    O'Neill, William W.
    Kapur, Navin K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2018, 24 (10) : 706 - 710
  • [2] Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative
    Basir, Mir B.
    Schreiber, Theodore
    Dixon, Simon
    Alaswad, Khaldoon
    Patel, Kirit
    Almany, Steven
    Khandelwal, Akshay
    Hanson, Ivan
    George, Augustine
    Ashbrook, Michael
    Blank, Nimrod
    Abdelsalam, Murad
    Sareen, Nishtha
    Timmis, Steven B. H.
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (03) : 454 - 461
  • [3] Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock
    Basir, Mir B.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Maini, Brijeshwar S.
    Khandelwal, Akshay K.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (06) : 845 - 851
  • [4] Preliminary experience with Impella Recover® LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: A new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit
    Bresson, Didier
    Sibellas, Franck
    Farhat, Fadi
    Jegaden, Olivier
    Kirkorian, Gilbert
    Bonnefoy, Eric
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2011, 104 (8-9) : 458 - 464
  • [5] Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Trani, Carlo
    Doshi, Sagar N.
    Townend, Jonathan
    van Geuns, Robert Jan
    Hunziker, Patrick
    Schieffer, Bernhard
    Karatolios, Konstantinos
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Ribichini, Flavio L.
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 201 : 684 - 691
  • [6] The Use of Impella 2.5 in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Complicating an Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Casassus, Frederic
    Corre, Jerome
    Leroux, Lionel
    Chevalereau, Pierre
    Fresselinat, Aurelie
    Seguy, Benjamin
    Calderon, Joachim
    Coste, Pierre
    Ouattara, Alexandre
    Roques, Xavier
    Barandon, Laurent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [7] Dens J, 2006, EuroIntervention, V2, P84
  • [8] Engström AE, 2013, MINERVA CARDIOANGIOL, V61, P539
  • [9] Left Ventricular Unloading Before Reperfusion Promotes Functional Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Esposito, Michele L.
    Zhang, Yali
    Qiao, Xiaoying
    Reyelt, Lara
    Paruchuri, Vikram
    Schnitzler, Gavin R.
    Morine, Kevin J.
    Annamalai, Shiva K.
    Bogins, Courtney
    Natov, Peter S.
    Pedicini, Robert
    Breton, Catalina
    Mullin, Andrew
    Mackey, Emily E.
    Patel, Ayan
    Rowin, Ethan
    Jaffe, Iris Z.
    Karas, Richard H.
    Kapur, Navin K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (05) : 501 - 514
  • [10] Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: A report from the SHOCK trial registry
    Fincke, R
    Hochman, JS
    Lowe, AM
    Menon, V
    Slater, JN
    Webb, JG
    LeJemtel, TH
    Cotter, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) : 340 - 348