Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
van Dort, D. I. M. [1 ]
Peij, K. R. A. H. [1 ]
Manintveld, O. C. [2 ]
Hoeks, S. E. [3 ]
Morshuis, W. J. [1 ]
van Royen, N. [4 ]
Ten Cate, T. [4 ]
Geuzebroek, G. S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Impella; Haemodynamic monitoring; Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Left ventricular assist device; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; IMPELLA; 5.0; DEVICE; EXPERIENCE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; BRIDGE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12471-019-01351-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device is designed to augment cardiac output and reduce left ventricular wall stress and aims to improve survival in cases of cardiogenic shock. In this meta-analysis we investigated the haemodynamic effects of the Impella device in a clinical setting. We systematically searched all articles in PubMed/Medline and Embase up to July 2019. The primary outcomes were cardiac power (CP) and cardiac power index (CPI). Survival rates and other haemodynamic data were included as secondary outcomes. For the critical appraisal, we used a modified version of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services quality assessment form. The systematic review included 12 studies with a total of 596 patients. In 258 patients the CP and/or CPI could be extracted. Our meta-analysis showed an increase of 0.39 W [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24, 0.54], (p = 0.01) and 0.22 W/m(2) (95% CI: 0.18, 0.26), (p < 0.01) for the CP and CPI, respectively. The overall survival rate was 56% (95% CI: 0.50, 0.62), (p = 0.09). The quality of the studies was moderate, mostly due to the presence of confounders. Our study suggests that in patients with cardiogenic shock, Impella support seems effective in augmenting CP(I). This study merely investigates the haemodynamic effectiveness of the Impella device and does not reflect the complete clinical impact for the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 189
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Haemodynamic efficacy of microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    D. I. M. van Dort
    K. R. A. H. Peij
    O. C. Manintveld
    S. E. Hoeks
    W. J. Morshuis
    N. van Royen
    T. Ten Cate
    G. S. C Geuzebroek
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2020, 28 : 179 - 189
  • [2] Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Shien
    Low, Christopher
    Ng, Wei
    Ling, Ryan
    Tan, Chuen
    Lim, Shir
    Cherian, Robin
    Lin, Weiqin
    Shekar, Kiran
    Mitra, Saikat
    MacLaren, Graeme
    Ramanathan, Kollengode
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [3] Outcome of right ventricular assist device implantation following left ventricular assist device implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Reid, Gregory
    Mork, Constantin
    Gahl, Brigita
    Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
    von Segesser, Ludwig K.
    Eckstein, Friedrich
    Berdajs, Denis A.
    PERFUSION-UK, 2022, 37 (08): : 773 - 784
  • [4] Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Haddad, Toufi K. Mahfood
    Saurav, Alok
    Smer, Aiman
    Azzouz, Muhammad S.
    Akinapelli, Abhilash
    Williams, Mark A.
    Alla, Venkata M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOPULMONARY REHABILITATION AND PREVENTION, 2017, 37 (06) : 390 - 396
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ribeiro, R. V.
    Lee, J.
    Singh, S.
    Yau, T. M.
    Friedrich, J. O.
    Yanagawa, B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S457 - S457
  • [6] RACIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENCES IN PATTERNS OF GROWTH IN USE OF THE PERCUTANEOUS MICROAXIAL LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK
    Almarzooq, Zaid
    Chen, Siyan
    Song, Yang
    Sun, Tianyu
    Secemsky, Eric Alexander
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 964 - 964
  • [7] Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock
    Ravn, Hanne Berg
    Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (03): : 302 - 303
  • [8] MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE CARDIOGENIC SHOCK WITH THE IMPELLA MICROAXIAL LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE: EARLY EXPERIENCE IN A SINGLE CENTER
    Mazine, A.
    Forcillo, J.
    Demers, P.
    Bouchard, D.
    Lamarche, Y.
    Carrier, M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 29 (10) : S226 - S226
  • [9] Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    Akin, Sakir
    Jewbali, Lucia S.
    Miranda, Dinis dos Reis
    Brugts, Jasper J.
    Constantinescu, Alina A.
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Caliskan, Kadir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [10] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THALIDOMIDE IN TREATMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE ASSOCIATED GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Rahman, Syed Hamaad
    Qureshi, Mahir
    DeRon, Nathan
    Khan, Nihal Ijaz I.
    Hurairah, Abu
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S1318 - S1318