Anterior robotic approach in en-bloc sacrectomy: a preliminary experience

被引:6
作者
Corrado, Giacomo [1 ]
Zoccali, Carmine [2 ]
Salducca, Nicola [2 ]
Oddi, Andrea [3 ]
Vizza, Enrico [4 ]
Biagini, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Hlth Women & Children, Gynecol Oncol Unit, Rome, Italy
[2] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Expt Clin Oncol, Orthoped Oncol Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Expt Clin Oncol, Liver & Pancreat Surg Unit, Rome, Italy
[4] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Expt Clin Oncol, Gynecol Oncol Unit, Rome, Italy
关键词
En-bloc sacrectomy; Robot-assisted surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CANCER; OUTCOMES; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-018-0807-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
En-bloc sacrectomy is a highly demanding surgical procedure necessary to obtain wide margin in sacral tumor. The double approach, anterior and posterior approach, is usually preferred for tumors extending proximally to S3 level where iliac internal vessels are at a higher risk for damage during posterior surgery. It can be justified also in selected cases to decrease the risk of posterior approach as in local recurrence or in patients who already underwent laparotomy. Our intent was to apply robotic-assisted techniques for performing anterior preparatory approach for sacrectomy surgery. Between December 2010 and December 2014, three cases of sacrectomies were performed in a previous robotic-assisted preparatory approach to separate the rectum from the tumor. Dissections were successfully performed in all cases close to the pelvic floor. The surgeon was able to position a Gore-Tex spacer between the anterior tumor surface and the rectum in all cases. The anterior dissections were performed with a perfect control of bleeding. No complications related to the anterior approach were reported. Robot-assisted surgery can be considered a valid and minimally invasive technique which allows a safe anterior dissection of the pelvic structures dividing tumors from surrounding tissues. It allows to place a spacer to protect organs during posterior sacral resection performed on the same day or at a later time. Further experiences are advocated to evaluate its efficiency in sacral tumors of greater size.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques
    Bell, Maria C.
    Torgerson, Jenny
    Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
    Suttle, Allison Wierda
    Hunt, Sharon
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) : 407 - 411
  • [2] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Costello, Anthony
    Eastham, James A.
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Menon, Mani
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Van der Poel, Henk
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 418 - 430
  • [3] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    DeNardis, Sara A.
    Peterson, Lorna B.
    Sultana, Nazia
    Bigsby, Glenn E.
    Pikaart, Dirk P.
    Finkler, Neil J.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 115 (03) : 447 - 452
  • [4] Outcomes and Cost Comparisons After Introducing a Robotics Program for Endometrial Cancer Surgery
    Lau, Susie
    Vaknin, Zvi
    Ramana-Kumar, Agnihotram V.
    Halliday, Darron
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    Gotlieb, Walter H.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) : 717 - 724
  • [5] National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health US Department of Health and Human Services, 2017, COMM TERM CRIT ADV E
  • [6] A detailed analysis of the learning curve: Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer
    Seamon, Leigh G.
    Fowler, Jeffrey M.
    Richardson, Debra L.
    Carlson, Matthew J.
    Valmadre, Sue
    Phillips, Gary S.
    Cohn, David E.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) : 162 - 167
  • [7] Sert BM, 2006, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V27, P531
  • [8] The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery
    Sgarbura, Olivia
    Vasilescu, Catalin
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 3149 - 3155
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A case control study
    Vizza, E.
    Corrado, G.
    Mancini, E.
    Vici, R.
    Sergi, D.
    Baiocco, E.
    Patrizi, L.
    Saltari, M.
    Pomati, G.
    Cutillo, G.
    [J]. EJSO, 2015, 41 (01): : 142 - 147
  • [10] Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2
    Walker, Joan L.
    Piedmonte, Marion R.
    Spirtos, Nick M.
    Eisenkop, Scott M.
    Schlaerth, John B.
    Mannel, Robert S.
    Spiegel, Gregory
    Barakat, Richard
    Pearl, Michael L.
    Sharma, Sudarshan K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (32) : 5331 - 5336