Histopathologic Response Criteria Predict Survival of Patients with Resected Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

被引:304
|
作者
Pataer, Apar [1 ]
Kalhor, Neda [2 ]
Correa, Arlene M. [1 ]
Raso, Maria Gabriela [2 ]
Erasmus, Jeremy J. [3 ]
Kim, Edward S. [4 ]
Behrens, Carmen [4 ]
Lee, J. Jack [5 ]
Roth, Jack A. [1 ]
Stewart, David J. [4 ]
Vaporciyan, Ara A. [1 ]
Wistuba, Ignacio I. [2 ,4 ]
Swisher, Stephen G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Lung cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Histopathology; TUMOR-REGRESSION; PHASE-III; FOLLOW-UP; CISPLATIN; SURGERY; COMBINATION; GEMCITABINE; THERAPY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e318247504a
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: We evaluated the ability of histopathologic response criteria to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Tissue specimens from 358 patients with NSCLC were evaluated by pathologists blinded to the patient treatment and outcome. The surgical specimens were reviewed for various histopathologic features in the tumor including percentage of residual viable tumor cells, necrosis, and fibrosis. The relationship between the histopathologic findings and OS was assessed. Results: The percentage of residual viable tumor cells and surgical pathologic stage were associated with OS and DFS in 192 patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). There was no association of OS or DFS with percentage of viable tumor cells in 166 patients with NSCLC who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.31 and p = 0.45, respectively). Long-term OS and DFS were significantly prolonged in patients who had. <= 10% viable tumor compared with patients with > 10% viable tumor cells (5 years OS, 85% versus 40%, p < 0.0001 and 5 years DFS, 78% versus 35%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The percentages of residual viable tumor cells predict OS and DFS in patients with resected NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy even when controlled for pathologic stage. Histopathologic assessment of resected specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy could potentially have a role in addition to pathologic stage in assessing prognosis, chemotherapy response, and the need for additional adjuvant therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 832
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Graded Histologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Predict Survival for Completely Resected Gastric Cancer?
    John C. Mansour
    Laura Tang
    Manish Shah
    David Bentrem
    David S. Klimstra
    Mithat Gonen
    David P. Kelsen
    Murray F. Brennan
    Daniel G. Coit
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14 : 3412 - 3418
  • [2] Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer?
    Mansour, John C.
    Tang, Laura
    Shah, Manish
    Bentrem, David
    Klimstra, David S.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Kelsen, David P.
    Brennan, Murray F.
    Coit, Daniel G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (12) : 3412 - 3418
  • [3] Major pathologic response and biomarker predict survival in lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Pataer, Apar
    Shao, Ruping
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Wistuba, Ignacio I.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [4] Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on survival for resected gastric cancer
    Greenleaf, Erin
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    Wong, Joyce
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [5] Major Pathologic Response and Prognostic Score Predict Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Pataer, Apar
    Weissferdt, Annikka
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Sepesi, Boris
    Heymach, John V.
    Berezowska, Sabina
    Cascone, Tina
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS, 2022, 3 (11):
  • [6] Quality of Pathologic Response and Surgery Correlate With Survival for Patients With Completely Resected Bladder Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Sonpavde, Guru
    Goldman, Bryan H.
    Speights, V. O.
    Lerner, Seth P.
    Wood, David P.
    Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
    Trump, Donald L.
    Natale, Ronald B.
    Grossman, H. Barton
    Crawford, E. David
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (18) : 4104 - 4109
  • [7] Histopathologic criteria for assessment of treatment response and tumor regression in advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Sassen, S
    Fend, F
    Kuhn, W
    Avril, N
    Schmalfeldt, B
    Busch, R
    Hoefler, H
    Naehrig, J
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 86 : 195A - 195A
  • [8] Immune contexture and histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict clinical outcome of lung cancer patients
    Remark, Romain
    Lupo, Audrey
    Alifano, Marco
    Biton, Jerome
    Ouakrim, Hanane
    Stefani, Alessandro
    Cremer, Isabelle
    Goc, Jeremy
    Regnard, Jean-Francois
    Dieu-Nosjean, Marie-Caroline
    Damotte, Diane
    ONCOIMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 5 (12):
  • [9] Histopathologic criteria for assessment of treatment response and tumor regression in advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Sassen, S
    Fend, F
    Kuhn, W
    Avril, N
    Schmalfeldt, B
    Busch, R
    Hoefler, H
    Naehrig, J
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 : 195A - 195A
  • [10] Major pathologic response and RAD51 predict survival in lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Pataer, Apar
    Shao, Ruping
    Correa, Arlene M.
    Behrens, Carmen
    Roth, Jack A.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Wistuba, Ignacio I.
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (06): : 2405 - 2414