A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches for sensitivity analysis in computational systems biology

被引:12
作者
Simoni, Giulia [1 ,2 ]
Hong Thanh Vo [3 ]
Priami, Corrado [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Marchetti, Luca [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Microsoft Res, Ctr Computat & Syst Biol COSBI, Piazza Manifattura 1, I-38068 Rovereto, TN, Italy
[2] Univ Trento, Math, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Espoo, Finland
[4] Univ Pisa, Comp Sci, Pisa, Italy
[5] Stanford SPARK Global Initiat, Pisa Node, Pisa, Italy
[6] COSBI, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[7] COSBI, Computat Biol Team, Rovereto, TN, Italy
[8] Univ Verona, Verona, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
sensitivity analysis; deterministic simulation; stochastic simulation; mathematical modeling; computational biology; systems biology; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; GRADIENT ESTIMATION; CHEMICAL-SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1093/bib/bbz014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
With the recent rising application of mathematical models in the field of computational systems biology, the interest in sensitivity analysis methods had increased. The stochastic approach, based on chemical master equations, and the deterministic approach, based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs), are the two main approaches for analyzing mathematical models of biochemical systems. In this work, the performance of these approaches to compute sensitivity coefficients is explored in situations where stochastic and deterministic simulation can potentially provide different results (systems with unstable steady states, oscillators with population extinction and bistable systems). We consider two methods in the deterministic approach, namely the direct differential method and the finite difference method, and five methods in the stochastic approach, namely the Girsanov transformation, the independent random number method, the common random number method, the coupled finite difference method and the rejection-based finite difference method. The reviewed methods are compared in terms of sensitivity values and computational time to identify differences in outcome that can highlight conditions in which one approach performs better than the other.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 540
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   AN EFFICIENT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES OF CONTINUOUS TIME MARKOV CHAINS [J].
Anderson, David F. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 50 (05) :2237-2258
[2]  
Asmussen S., 2007, Stochastic simulation: algorithms and analysis, V57, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-69033-9
[3]   Robustness and period sensitivity analysis of minimal models for biochemical oscillators [J].
Caicedo-Casso, Angelica ;
Kang, Hye-Won ;
Lim, Sookkyung ;
Hong, Christian I. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[4]   Artificial Biochemistry [J].
Cardelli, Luca .
ALGORITHMIC BIOPROCESSES, 2009, :429-462
[5]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION SYSTEMS - DIRECT METHOD [J].
DICKINSON, RP ;
GELINAS, RJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 21 (02) :123-143
[6]  
FIELD RJ, 1974, J CHEM PHYS, V60, P1877, DOI 10.1063/1.1681288
[7]   Efficient exact stochastic simulation of chemical systems with many species and many channels [J].
Gibson, MA ;
Bruck, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2000, 104 (09) :1876-1889
[8]   GENERAL METHOD FOR NUMERICALLY SIMULATING STOCHASTIC TIME EVOLUTION OF COUPLED CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
GILLESPIE, DT .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (04) :403-434
[9]   EXACT STOCHASTIC SIMULATION OF COUPLED CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
GILLESPIE, DT .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 81 (25) :2340-2361
[10]   LIKELIHOOD RATIO GRADIENT ESTIMATION FOR STOCHASTIC-SYSTEMS [J].
GLYNN, PW .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1990, 33 (10) :75-84